Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2509 Patna
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16949 of 2018
======================================================
Wasim Akhtar S/o Late Sk. Moin Uddin, R/o Mohalla- Bhikhanpur, Gumti No.3, Near Hatia, Kohsar Gali, Sahma Hussain Lane, P.S.- Ishakchak, Town and District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The T. M. Bhagalpur University
2. The Vice Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
3. The Registrar, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
4. The Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
5. The University Auditor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
6. The Principal, Marwari College, Bhagalpur.
7. The Principal, S.M. College, Bhagalpur.
8. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New
9. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
10. The In-Charge Officer, Pay Verification Cell, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Bihar State null null
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Purushottam Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP 23 For the University : Mr. Rekha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-05-2023
Heard the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following
prayers:-
(i) to hold the action of the respondents concerned in
not sanctioning pension of the petitioner as per his last month's
actual pay being Rs. 27,310/- only as illegal; Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
(ii) to direct the respondent authorities to fix the
pension of the petitioner as per his last month's actual basic
pay;
(iii) to direct the respondents specially the authorities
of the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University (henceforth for short
'the University') to ensure that the payment of all due benefits
upon grant of financial Progressions under Assured Career
Progression Scheme/ Modified Assured Career Progression
Scheme is/are granted;
(iv) further, directing the authorities to ensure that the
payments are made immediately;
(v) to grant penal interest at least @ 12% per annum
over petitioner's said unpaid claims;
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that right
since his appointment till the retirement, his status remained as
that of an Assistant and as such he is entitled to the said relief.
4. It is his further submission that the petitioner never
came to know about the corrigendum dated 18.01.2018 and
once the same has been brought on record by 'the University' by
way of counter affidavit, he has filed I.A. No. 01/2020 with a
prayer for quashing of the same.
5. His further submission is that some of the Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
documents/correspondence of the respondents shows his status
as an Assistant.
6. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the
Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University ( the respondent nos. 2 to 5)
in which it has been stated that the petitioner was never
appointed as an Assistant rather he was an Accounts Assistant
which reflects from Annexure-5 to the writ petition i.e. the
memo no. 944-946/84 dated 18.05.1984.
7. This Court deems it appropriate to incorporate the
said memo dated 18.05.1984 issued by the respondent no. 7, the
Sundarwati Mahila College, Bhagalpur which read as follows:
**lqUnjorh efgyk egkfo|ky;
Hkkxyiqj ¼fcgkj½ i= la[;k& [email protected] fnukad& [email protected]@84 dk;kZy; vkns"k& 1984 p;u lfefr] lqUnjorh efgyk egkfo|ky;] Hkkxyiqj ds vuq"kalk ds vk/kkj ij Jh olhe v[rj dks ys[kk&lgk;d ds in ij 730&15&820&20&980&n0jks0&20&1080 ds osrueku esa fo"ofo|ky; dh Lohd`fr ds izfrcU/k ds lkFk vLFkk;h :i ls fu;qDr fd;k tkrk gSA Jh v[rj dks mDr osrueku dk ,d bdjkjukek nsuk gksxk fd ;fn fo"ofo|ky; fcgkj ljdkj bl osrueku dh Lohd`fr ugha ns rks vf/kd Hkqxrku dh xbZ jkf"k mUgsa okil djuk gksxk A iqu% bUgsa vkns"k fn;k tkrk gS fd os vfoyEc viuk inHkkj xzg.k dj ysa A in Hkkj xzg.k djus ds fufeÙk fdlh izdkj dk HkÙkk vkfn ns; ugha gksxkA [email protected]& Hkkxyiqj& 8-1-2001 ¼vfufUnrk eq[kthZ½ iz/kkukpk;kZ fnukad& 16-05-1984 lqUnjorh efgyk egkfo|ky;
Hkkxyiqj Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
Kki la[;k& 944&[email protected] fnukad& [email protected]&5&1984 izfrfyfi izsf'kr] 1- Jh olhe v[rj] Hkh[kuiqj] Hkkxyiqj 2- dqylfpo] Hkkxyiqj fo"ofo|ky; ds lwpukFkZ ,oa vuqeksnukFkZ 3- Jh ";ke lqUnj feJ] ys[kk lgk;d] lqUnjorh efgyk egkfo|ky; ds lwpukFkZ ,oa vko";d dk;kZFkZ A**
8. Further, the then Bhagalpur University vide memo
no. B/24826 dated dated 29.07.1987 informed the concerned
college (the respondent no.7) about confirmation of the
petitioner's service as Accounts Officer. The letter dated
29.07.1987 read as follows:
"BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY BHAGALPUR-812007
29th July, 1987 Dr M. Sowaid Registrar
To The Principal, S.M. College, Bhagalpur
Sub: Confirmation of the services of Md. Wasim Akhtar, Accounts Assistant, S.M. College, Bhagalpur.
Madam,
With reference to your letter No. 306/82 dated 22.07.87 I am to inform you that the Vice-
Chancellor has been plead to order for confirmation of the services of Sri Wasim Akhtar, Accounts Assistant of your College, w.e.f. the date Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
of his joining. Accordingly the services of Sri Wasim Akhtar, Accountants Assistant is confirmed w.e.f. the date of his joining i.e. 18.05.84.
Yours faithfully,
(M. Sowaid) Registrar"
9. Learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 5, 'the
University' submits that inadvertently, in some correspondence,
he was addressed as an "Assistant" and the petitioner grabbed
the said opportunity to claim the said post which is on higher
pedestal. It is his submission that the petitioner was never given
the said higher post.
10. 'The University' has now brought on record the
letter dated 18.01.2018 and 13.01.2015 to show that orders have
been passed in the matter clarifying the fact that the post of the
petitioner be read as an Accounts Assistant. The said orders
was/were never challenged by the petitioner and/or set aside, he
is not entitled for relief.
11. This Court has taken note of the corrigendum vide
memo no. B/2021-30 dated 18.01.2018 by which it has been
clarified that the petitioner be considered as an Accounts
Assistant instead of Assistant and for appreciation, the same is
incorporated herein below:
Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
"TILKA MAJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR- 812007 frydk ek¡>h Hkkxyiqj fo"ofo|ky;] Hkkxyiqj& 812 007
'kqf)&i= iwoZ esa fuxZr dk;kZy; vkns"k la[;k& [email protected] ,oa dk;kZy; vkns"k la[;k& [email protected]] Kki la[;k& B/1939-69 fnukad 13-01-2015 esa vkaf"kd la"kks/ku fd;k tkrk gSA la"kks/kuksijkUr eks0 olhe v[rj in uke lgk;d ds txg ys[kk lgk;d i<+k tk;A vkns"kkuqlkj [email protected]& vLi'V dqylfpo Kkikad& B/2021-30 fnukad 18-01-2018 izfrfyfi izsf'kr % 1- mi;qZDr dehZ dks 2- izHkkjh izkpk;Z] ekjokM+h dkWyst] Hkkxyiqj] 3- foÙk inkf/kdkjh] 4- iz"kk[kk inkf/kdkjh] isa"[email protected]@vads{k.k 5- [email protected] izfrdqyifr ,oa dqylfpo ds futh lgk;d dks 6- lgk;d] dk;kZy; vkns"kj{kd] frydk ek¡>h Hkkxyiqj fo"ofo|ky;] Hkkxyiqj dks lwpukFkZ ,oa vko";d dk;kZFkZA [email protected]& vLi'V dqylfpo**
12. Further, his letter of appointment dated
18.05.1984 issued by the respondent no. 7 the S.M. College
Bhagalpur shows him as an Accounts Assistant. The
confirmation order/letter dated 29.07.1987 of the Bhagalpur
University too gave the status of Accounts Assistant to the
petitioner.
13. There is no document on record to show that
subsequently, the petitioner was promoted to the post of
Assistant. The petitioner has also not brought any document in
the writ petition showing his promotion as an Assistant Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
subsequently.
14. It is to be noted that this Court repeatedly asked
from the learned counsel for the petitioner as to:
(i) whether the petitioner was ever
appointed as an Assistant;
(ii) whether he was ever promoted to the
post of Assistant from Account Assistant to make
such claim.
15. The answer by the learned counsel for the
petitioner to both the questions of this Court was in negative. He
however reiterated that as certain documents of the respondents
showed him as an Assistant, he is entitled for the relief.
16. It is to be noted that the dust has now been settled
by 'the University' and the corrigendum dated 18.01.2018 has
already been issued.
17. The petitioner preferred the present writ petition
in August 2018 with prayer for grant of relief treating him as an
Assistant but surreptitiously chose not to challenge the
clarification dated 18.01.2018 which had already come into
existence in January 2018 itself.
18. The alibi of the petitioner about no knowledge of
the said letter dated 18.01.2018 is an afterthought and fit to be Patna High Court CWJC No.16949 of 2018 dt.19-05-2023
rejected.
19. This Court is convinced with the stand of 'the
University' that the appointment of the petitioner was as an
Accounts Assistant and he was never given the status of
Assistant. The correspondence between the official in which
inadvertently, he was shown as an Assistant cannot be a ground
for him to claim the pay scale of the Assistant which is on a
higher grade.
20. Consequently, he cannot claim fixation of his
pension as an Assistant. In the aforesaid background, the
petitioner is not entitled to the reliefs he has sought for in the
present writ petition.
21. The petition lacks merit and is accordingly
dismissed.
Ref : I.A. No. 1/2020
In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, the I.A.
No. 1 of 2020 too is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to
challenge the same as a separate cause of action, if he so wants.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/-
AFR/NAFR AFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 24.05.2023 Transmission Date 24.05.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!