Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Jitendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 2088 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2088 Patna
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2023

Patna High Court
Shri Jitendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 3 May, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14044 of 2021
     ======================================================

Shri Jitendra Kumar, S/o Kuldeep Yadav, Resident of Village-Chandauti, P.S. Chandauti, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

2. The Principle Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

3. The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

4. The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

5. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Imamganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Alok, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 03-05-2023

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief(s):-

"(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 20.08.2020 (Annexure-1) by which Respondent No. 4 has blacklisted the petitioner for ten years stating that the documents with regard to experience certificate and turnover submitted by the petitioner is forged.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14044 of 2021 dt.03-05-2023

(ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter dated 19.10.2020 (Annexure-2) issued by Respondent No. 5 by which the advance money and the security of Rs. 31,41,000/- has been forfeited and recovery proceeding has been directed to be initiated.

(iii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter dated 24.08.2020 (Annexure-4) by which the respondent No. 4 has directed for re-tender of work of T03 Dumarawan to NH via Tillaiya Delho.

(iv) For issuance of any other relief or relief(s) for which the petitioner is entitled for."

2. The petitioner was successful bidder in respect of

particular work. It is reliably learnt that petitioner had executed

certain works. At that juncture, the respondents noticed that the

petitioner is alleged to have filed false affidavit by taking note of

alleged filing of false affidavit notice has been issued on

30.07.2020 Annexure-R/H. Thereafter, proceeded to black-list the

petitioner for a period of 10 years on 20.08.2020.

3. Hence, the present petition insofar as challenging

black-listing and consequential orders. Perusal of show-cause

notice dated 30.07.2020, it does not reveal specific notice of black-

listing the petitioner for a period of 10 years. Further, the petitioner

has contended that notice has not been served on the petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.14044 of 2021 dt.03-05-2023

vide Para 6 of the writ petition. On the other hand, the same has

been countered merely stating that show-cause notice dated

30.07.2020 has been served on the petitioner without producing

any material information so as to meet or counter Para 6 of the

writ petition. Even otherwise the petitioner has made out a case,

since show-cause notice dated 30.07.2020 showing dearth of

material information like proposal to black-list the petitioner for a

period of 10 years. Apex Court in the case of UMC Technologies

Pvt. Ltd. vs. Food Corporation of India and Another, reported in

(2021) 2 SCC 551 read with Isolators And Isolators Through Its

Proprietor Mrs. Sandhya Mishra vs. Madhya Pradesh Madhya

Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. & Anr. reported in 2023 LiveLaw

(SC) 330 held that show-cause notice must be very specific insofar

as black-listing or debarring contractor.

4. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the

petitioner has made out a case accordingly, Annexure-R/H dated

30.07.2020 is set aside. Reserving liberty to the concerned

respondent to initiate appropriate proceedings if it is warranted.

5. Such proceedings, if any, shall be completed within a

period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. The

concerned authority is hereby directed to take note of judicial Patna High Court CWJC No.14044 of 2021 dt.03-05-2023

pronouncements cited in the present order before proceeding

further, if any.

6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands allowed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          08.05.2023
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter