Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Md. Jafar Rakib @ Md. Zafar Rakib vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 2059 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2059 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2023

Patna High Court
Md. Jafar Rakib @ Md. Zafar Rakib vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.651 of 2023
     ======================================================

Md. Jafar Rakib @ Md. Zafar Rakib S/o Late Abdur Rakib, Resident of Village - Chhoti Masjid Lane, Hassan Colony Sipahi Tola, Rose Cottage P.S. - K. Hat, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Secretary General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Addl. Chief Secretary Finance Department, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Special Executive Officer, General Administration Department Bihar, Patna.

7. The District Magistrate, Katihar.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate
                                    Mr. Prakash Mahto, Advocate
                                    Mr. Jawed Ahmad, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1
     For the AG             :       Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
                                    Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-05-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner in the present case is seeking payment of

his post-retiral benefits i.e. gratuity, unutilised leave encashment,

differences of salary for the period of suspension, subsistence

allowance from the date of suspension i.e. 25.07.2018 to the date

of revocation i.e. 30.06.2020, earned leave from 27.05.2018 to

02.07.2018 and other consequential benefits with panel interest. Patna High Court CWJC No.651 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner was a member of the Bihar Administrative Service who

vide Memo No. 27 dated 30.06.2020 issued under signature of

Additional Secretary of the Government, General Administration

Department, Bihar, Patna was proceeded against in a disciplinary

proceeding. He was facing prosecution at the instance of a sub-

ordinate staff who alleged that the petitioner had committed an

offence under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and had

lodged Nagar Sahayak, Katihar P.S. Case No. 318 of 2018.

4. It is stated that the petitioner was suspended from

service vide Memo No. 9899 dated 25.07.2018. Admittedly, the

petitioner had been promoted to the post of Additional Secretary

vide Resolution No. 8223 dated 20.06.2018 but till 25.07.2018 i.e.

the date on which he was placed under suspension, he could not

join on the promoted post.

5. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner attained

his age of superannuation on 30.06.2020, his suspension was

revoked in the first half of 30.06.2020 and on the same day, the

petitioner submitted his joining on his promoted post.

6. Learned counsel further submits that in the

disciplinary proceeding which continued after retirement of the

petitioner, the competent authority decided to forfeit/deduct 20% Patna High Court CWJC No.651 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023

of the pension of the petitioner for five years. The order of

punishment was passed vide Department's Resolution No. 7286

dated 17.05.2022. A review preferred by the petitioner against the

order of punishment failed vide Resolution Memo No. 12128

dated 18.07.2022.

7. Learned counsel submits that the order of punishment

against the petitioner has been set aside by this Court in CWJC

No. 482 of 2023 and the disciplinary authority has been directed to

take a fresh decision within a period of four months.

8. Learned counsel submits that prior to passing of the

order withholding 20% pension of the petitioner, the competent

authority had sanctioned provisional pension to the extent of 90%

on the ground that the disciplinary proceeding was still pending

against the petitioner. It is the grievance of the petitioner that even

though the petitioner had submitted his joining as an Additional

Secretary, the petitioner is not being treated on the said post and

the benefits of the said post is not being made available to the

petitioner.

9. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

State. According to the counter affidavit, the amount equal to

unutilised earned leave of the petitioner has been sanctioned in his

favour vide Department's Order No. 11650 dated 08.12.2020. An Patna High Court CWJC No.651 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023

order contained in Department's Letter No. 11652 dated

08.12.2020 has been issued for payment of group insurance in

favour of the petitioner.

10. As regards the treatment of the period of suspension

is concerned, it is stated that the petitioner's application in this

regard has been examined by the disciplinary authority and the

disciplinary authority has vide Resolution contained in Memo No.

19541 dated 03.11.2022 decided to treat the suspension period of

the petitioner in the following manner:-

(i) for the period of suspension nothing would be

admissible to the petitioner save and except subsistence allowance

and (ii) the period of suspension would be referred for the purpose

of pension only.

11. As regards demand of the petitioner for

increment/fixing equivalent pension after his joining on the

promoted post on 30.06.2020 is concerned, it is the stand of the

respondents that the suspension of the petitioner was revoked vide

Department's Resolution Memo No. 633 dated 30.06.2020 w.e.f.

the afternoon of 30th June, 2020 which means that he remained

under suspension till 30.06.2020 i.e. till his date of retirement,

therefore, his joining application dated 30.06.2020 in the

Department was infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.651 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023

12. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has

relied upon the Rule 58 of the Bihar Service Code to submit that

because the petitioner was deprived from submitting his joining

because of the reasons beyond his control, the respondents are

obliged to accept his joining simultaneously with the order of

revocation of suspension of the petitioner.

13. On the other hand, on this point, learned counsel for

the State submits that the monetary benefits of the promotional

post would have been admissible to the petitioner only upon his

submitting joining on the said post and because in this case, the

petitioner had not joined the promoted post between 20.06.2018

and 25.07.2018 and he remained under suspension till the date of

his retirement, he would not be entitled for the benefit of the post

of Additional Secretary.

14. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State as also on perusal of the records, this Court finds that so

far as the order of punishment of withholdment of 20% pension for

5 years of the petitioner is concerned, the same has already been

set aside by this Court and the matter has been remitted to the

competent authority.

15. In view of the setting aside of the order of

punishment imposed upon the petitioner, the respondent Patna High Court CWJC No.651 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023

authorities are liable to consider payment of his pensionary

benefits in accordance with Rules. So far as the other claims of the

petitioner are concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to file a

representation before the competent authority raising his claims

which should be supported by material particulars and the

petitioner would be at liberty to make a submission before the

competent authority on the applicability of Rule 58 of the Bihar

Service Code.

16. This Court, therefore, grants liberty to the petitioner

to file a detail representation before the Additional Chief Secretary,

General Administration Department, Government of Bihar

(respondent no. 1) within a period of one month from today which

will be considered after giving an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner and an appropriate order shall be passed by respondent

no. 1 within three months from the date of receipt of the

representation.

17. This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) lekhi/-sushma/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          04.05.2023
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter