Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2046 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.845 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
1. Mala Devi Wife of Shri Chandeshwar Yadav.
2. Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Kumar, Son of Sri Chandeshwar Yadav,
3. Sweta Kumari, daughter of Shri Chandeshwar Yadav.
4. Sumita Kumari @ Sumita, daughter of Sri Chandeshwar Yadav. All are resident of Rly. Station Road, P.S. Kasba District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Chandeshwar Yadav, Son of Late Ganey Yadav, Resident of Village Bhandairson, P.S.- Manigachhi, District Darbhanga, at present residing at Railway Hospital, Town P.S. Katihar, District- Katihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Adv.
: Mr. Indrajeet Kumar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Bal Krishna Mishra, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-05-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the
opposite party No.2.
The present Cr. Revision Application has been filed
against the judgment and the order dated 21.06.2017 passed by
Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea in Misc. Case No. 03 of
2017 by which the judgment and order passed in Maintenance
Case No. 10 of 2004 has been modified to the extent that
petitioner no.2 is entitled to get maintenance till attaining his Patna High Court CR. REV. No.845 of 2017 dt.01-05-2023
majority and petitioner no.3 & 4 will get maintenance till their
marriage i.e. 19.01.2012 and 19.11.2010 respectively.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the opposite party No.2 both are agreed to file their
respective representation before the Principal Judge, Family
Court, who upon verification about the marriage, birth
certificate and other documents to consider that whether the
petitioner no.2, 3 & 4 are major/ married/ debarred from any
other relief as per statute within 60 days from the date of order.
Both parties are also agreed that permission may be
granted to provide evidence in a fixed span of time to decide
this dispute.
In this background and the submissions made
above, the prayer of petitioners and opposite party are hereby
allowed. So far as the order part is concerned, this Court permits
that if any finding on the basis of hearing comes adverse or in
favour of the parties, the Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea
shall pass order accordingly. The finding of the order passed
under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. shall be in consonance of the order
which the Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea is going to
pass only and only figure of payment shall be changed.
The parties shall be at liberty to take time before Patna High Court CR. REV. No.845 of 2017 dt.01-05-2023
the Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea if they have any
physical problem.
With this direction, the present Cr. Revision
Application stands disposed off.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Ritik/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!