Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 902 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13858 of 2022
======================================================
Abdul Hadi Siddiqui, Son of Abdulahad, Resident of Village- Imli Bazar, Post Office- Lalbagh, Police Station- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. Lalit Narayan Mithila University, through the registrar, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
2. The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
3. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarva Deo Singh, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the LNMU : Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 23-02-2023
The petitioner by way of this writ petition has assailed
the letter dated 12th May 2022 passed by the Registrar whereby
the order passed by him on the directions of the Vice Chancellor
dated 16.04.2022 has been kept in abeyance.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
there was no authority available with the Vice Chancellor to
review its earlier order dated 16.04.2022 or to recall the said Patna High Court CWJC No.13858 of 2022 dt.23-02-2023
order.Learned counsel submits that the letter dated 12.05.2022
has been passed for extraneous reasons and considerations and
the order of keeping in abeyance suffers from mala fide. It is
further submitted that as per the Statute and Act, the Vice
Chancellor could have stayed/recalled his earlier order only
upon receiving directions from the Chancellor. He further
submits that once the Chancellor has been informed about the
approval by the Vice Chancellor, it is the Chancellor alone who
can direct for recalling of the said order or keeping that order in
abeyance.
3. I have considered the submissions made on behalf
of the parties. It is the settled law that in administrative actions,
the authority which has the power to issue an order also has the
power to recall it or keep the same in abeyance.
4. In the present case, as observed from the impugned
order dated 12.05.2022, it is apparent that some complaints have
been received about the verification of facts relating to the
concerned teachers and, therefore, the Vice Chancellor through
the Registrar has directed the Principal of the college to provide
a list of documents as mentioned in the said letter dated
12.05.2022 which includes documents relating to post
sanctioned by the University, method of appointment of teachers Patna High Court CWJC No.13858 of 2022 dt.23-02-2023
against the sanctioned post and the constitution of the selection
committee, eligibility, other qualification of the candidate has
been called for. A copy of the minutes of the selection
committee for all the subjects has also been called for.
5. Asking for such documents, cannot draw inference
of malice or bias on part of the Vice-Chancellor and his action is
found to be in consonance with the law.
6. This Court is satisfied that the teachers who are
performing the duties of an Associate Professor in a college
should not be kept in confusion and they should be informed
appropriately about their service conditions. Their appointment
was already approved by the Vice Chancellor earlier on
16.04.2022 which has been kept in abeyance and made subject
to proper verification of necessary facts. Such proper
verification of necessary facts, in the ordinary course, should
have been done before passing the order dated 16.04.2022.
7. However, if the said exercise is being done now, no
exception can be made to such course of action. However, it is
directed that such exercise of verification should be completed
within a stipulated period, preferably, within three months
whereafter the amount of grant lying with the University shall
be disbursed to the petitioners.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13858 of 2022 dt.23-02-2023
8. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted
to the authorities for the said purpose.
9.The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Ashwini/-
Item No.27 AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 25.02.2023 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!