Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Bihar vs Hari Kishore Sinha
2023 Latest Caselaw 859 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 859 Patna
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2023

Patna High Court
The State Of Bihar vs Hari Kishore Sinha on 21 February, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Letters Patent Appeal No.186 of 2021
                                           In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3968 of 2020
     ======================================================

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, patna

3. The Engineer in Chief Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... ... Appellant/s Versus Hari Kishore Sinha ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar ( Ac To Sc 26) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, Adv.

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

Date : 21-02-2023

Re: Interlocutory Application No. 02/2021.

The present Interlocutory Application has been

filed for condoning the delay of 222 days in preferring the

instant memo of appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the Interlocutory

Application, the delay of 222 days is condoned.

The Interlocutory Application No. 02/2021

stands allowed.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.186 of 2021 dt.21-02-2023

L.P.A. No. 186/ 2021

Heard Mr. Subodh Kumar, the learned Advocate

for the appellant/State and Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem, the

learned Advocate for the sole respondent.

The respondent was proceeded against

departmentally on the charge of his having accepted a

bribe of Rs. 3,000/- from some contractor while he was

posted as an Assistant Engineer. The respondent had been

caught in flagrante delicto. However, for the reason of the

proceeding not having been carried out in accordance with

the provisions prescribed under Bihar C.C.A. Rules, the

proceedings were quashed by a Bench of this Court vide

order dated 16.04.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 961 of

2015.

While quashing the entire departmental

proceeding and consequent order of termination, the

respondent was held to be entitled to all the consequential

benefits. However, the Bench permitted the State to

initiate a fresh proceedings against the respondent after

observing the procedure prescribed under law, in case so Patna High Court L.P.A No.186 of 2021 dt.21-02-2023

deemed necessary.

It appears from the pleadings in the appeal that a

proceeding under Section 43 (B) of the Bihar Pension

Rules was initiated against the respondent. However, in

the meantime, for the non-compliance of the order dated

16.04.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 961 of 2015, referred

to above, the respondent preferred a contempt petition

vide M.J.C. No. 2959 of 2018 which was disposed of on

16.08.2019 as the Court was made to understand that

there was substantial compliance of the order. However,

the respondent was given the liberty to assail the order

passed by the authority in an appropriate proceeding.

Thereafter, the respondent again approached this

Court vide C.W.J.C. No. 3968 of 2020, armed with the

order passed in the M.J.C. No. 2959 of 2018, claiming

that he has not been paid his retiral benefits i.e. pension,

gratuity, leave encashment and other dues which had been

directed to be paid to him as a consequence of the

quashing of the entire departmental proceeding as also the

order of termination of the respondent. Patna High Court L.P.A No.186 of 2021 dt.21-02-2023

The Bench, in this instance, vide order dated

24.06.2020 recorded that the respondent had retired on

31.12.2014 and that any proceedings against him,

notwithstanding the leave given by the Bench in C.W.J.C.

No. 961 of 2015 to start a fresh proceeding against the

respondent, could be carried out only in consonance with

the provisions contained in Rule 43(B) of the Bihar

Pension Rules and not otherwise. However, the Bench vide

order dated 24.06.2020, referred to the above, concluded

that the respondent be paid GPF, group insurance, leave

encashment and all other dues which are admissible to

him, if already not paid, within a fixed period of four

months, failing which, the respondent would be entitled to

recover 9% interests on all post retiral dues from the date

of filing of the writ application i.e., 19.02.2020 till the

date of actual payment.

This did not satisfy the respondent and on the

limited issue of the desirability of getting interest on the

retiral dues, from the date of retirement and not from the

date of filing of the writ petition as directed by the learned Patna High Court L.P.A No.186 of 2021 dt.21-02-2023

Single Judge, an appeal was filed by the respondent vide

L.P.A. No. 72 of 2021, which was dismissed vide order

dated 09.09.2021.

Mr. Subodh Kumar, the learned Advocate for the

appellant has stated that because of such orders, except

the leave encashment, the respondent has been paid 90%

of the gratuity amount and is being paid provisional

pension to the extent of 90% and other retiral dues.

The reason for preferring this appeal is that at all

stages, the respondents did not intimate the Courts that

the proceeding under Rule 43(B) of the Bihar Pension

Rules was pending. Such orders by the Courts appear to

have been passed without calling for an affidavit in

response to the petitions filed by the respondent.

Since, every other amount due to the appellant,

except leave encashment has been paid to the respondent,

we rest this appeal with a direction to conclude the

proceeding initiated against the respondent as

expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four

months.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.186 of 2021 dt.21-02-2023

Till the conclusion of the proceedings, nothing

shall be payable to the respondent and any decision with

respect to payment or recovery from the respondent, if

any, would be subject to the result of the proceedings

pending against the respondent under Rule 43 (B) of the

Bihar Pension Rules.

The appeal stands allowed and disposed of to the

extent indicated above.




                                                           (Ashutosh Kumar, J)



shivank/sunil-                                               (Harish Kumar, J)

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          24.02.2023.
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter