Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Jai Maa Ashapuri Through Its ... vs The Union Of India And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 803 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 803 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2023

Patna High Court
M/S. Jai Maa Ashapuri Through Its ... vs The Union Of India And Ors on 17 February, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2822 of 2019
     ======================================================

M/s. Jai Maa Ashapuri through its Proprietor namely Vinay Prasad Singh aged about 54 years, S/o Chandrasekhar Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Nepura (Berauti) P.S- Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Human Resource Development (Department of school Education and Literacy) New Delhi

2. The Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya through its Principal at Rewar, P.O-

Dumraon, P.S- Pakari Brawan, District-Nawada, Bihar

3. The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya at Rewar, P.O- Dumraon, P.S-

Pakari Brawan District- Nawada, Bihar

4. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna Bihar

5. District Magistrate, Nawada Bihar

6. District Development Commissioner, Nawada, Bihar Bihar

7. District Programme Officer, Nawada, Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 4 to 7: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (SC-13) Mr. U.K. Singh, AC to SC-13 For the NVS : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 17-02-2023

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for

following relief(s):-

"1) That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders or direction for:

Patna High Court CWJC No.2822 of 2019 dt.17-02-2023

(i) Commanding the Respondent No. 2 to obey the terms and conditions of the tender invitation information dated 11.05.18 as contained in Letter Tender/ UNVRE/ 2018-19/79 (Annexure-1), and to place the order to the Auction Bidders accordingly.

(ii) Further commanding the respondent authorities particularly the respondent 1st Set to do the payment of admitted dues for a sum of Rs. 27,557/- (Rupees Twenty seven thousand five hundred fifty seven only) in lieu of supply of goods for the month of July, August, September and October, 2018 respectively.

(iii) For grant of any other incidental or consequential relief/reliefs for which the petitioner can be found entitled for."

3. Matter is relating to supply of green vegetables,

chicken, eggs, fish etc. to respondent- Jawahar Navodaya

Vidyalaya, Rewar, Nawada. Petitioner was supplying

aforementioned materials. Due to certain administrative issues a

committee was constituted to revise the rates in which petitioner

had participated and he agreed for supply of the aforementioned

goods at the revised rates and it was to be effective from

01.09.2018. When things stood thus, he has taken stand that he

was compelled to sign papers. When he agreed for certain rates

and thereafter if he has turned around in that event he should

have questioned the validity of such document. There is no Patna High Court CWJC No.2822 of 2019 dt.17-02-2023

challenge to such document. Further it is evident from para 11

and 13 of the counter affidavit, grievance of the petitioner has

been redressed to certain extent. If the petitioner still feels that

his entire grievance has not been redressed then one has to draw

inference that it is a disputed issue which cannot be adjudicated

in the writ proceedings. Supreme Court in the case of Shalini

Shyam Shetty & Another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil reported

in (2010) 8 SCC 329, it is held that disputed matter cannot be

entertained in writ proceedings under Article 226 of

Constitution of India.

4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed

of reserving liberty to the petitioner to invoke appropriate

remedy if he is still aggrieved in respect of disputed amount.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Arun Kumar Jha, J)

rakhi/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                N.A.
Uploading Date          24.02.2023
Transmission Date       N.A.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter