Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mrf Limited vs State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 762 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 762 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2023

Patna High Court
Mrf Limited vs State Of Bihar on 14 February, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1845 of 2023
     ======================================================

MRF Limited a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 2nd Floor, Emarat Al Harmain, Bank Road, Patna through its authorized signatory James T M (aged about 45 years) son of Mathai resident of Thadathil House, Vazhithala P.O. Thodupuzha at present residing at Flat No. 103 Sharda Apartment, Road No. 3, New Patliputra Colony, Patna 800013.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

2. Addl. Commissioner of State Tax, (Appeal), Central Division, Patna having its office at Pant Bhawan, Boring Road, Patna.

3. Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Patliputra, Central, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 14-02-2023

The present writ application under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India has been filed seeking quashing of an

order dated 12.01.2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner

of State Tax (Appeal), Central Division, Patna, in Appeal Case

No. ST/PR-63/2022-23 for the period 2016-17 directing Patna High Court CWJC No.1845 of 2023 dt.14-02-2023

payment of 35% of disputed demand of tax and 20% of the

interest by 25.01.2023. The petitioner has preferred the

aforesaid appeal against an order passed under Section 31(1) of

the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 by the Assistant

Commissioner of State Tax, Patliputra Circle, Patna.

2. It is manifest that the said order has been passed

on a stay application filed by the petitioner before the appellate

authority while assailing an order passed by the Assistant

Commissioner of State Tax, Patliputra Circle, Patna dated

30.09.2022.

3. It is evident on plain reading of the order that the

same has been passed in accordance with the provision under

Rule 46 (4)(iii) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005

which reads as under:-

"The appellate or the revisional authority, as the case may be, may, in his discretion, by an order in writing, stay realisation of the amount of tax or interest, part or whole, as the case may be, in dispute, on such terms and conditions as he may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

4. Mr. D.V.Pathy, learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the petitioner, has argued that the impugned order of

the appellate authority passed on appellant's prayer for stay of

the demand notice, is non-speaking and the same has been Patna High Court CWJC No.1845 of 2023 dt.14-02-2023

passed without duly considering the petitioner's application for

stay of the demand.

5. Language of Clause (iii) of sub-rule (4) of Rule

46 is unambiguous. It confers upon the appellate authority or

the revisional authority under the Act, a discretion to stay

realisation of amount of tax or interest, part or whole, as the

case may be, in dispute, on such terms and conditions as he

may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the

case.

6. Mr. D.V.Pathy, learned counsel, has submitted

that the expression 'discretion' used in clause (iii) of sub-rule

(4) of Rule 46 should have been exercised judiciously by the

appellate authority and not in a mechanical manner.

7. We have carefully perused the impugned interim

order of the appellate authority. The appellate authority, in our

considered opinion, on due application of clause (iii) of sub-

rule (4) of Rule 46, has stayed the realisation of tax with certain

conditions as mentioned therein which are neither unjust nor

onerous.

8. We do not find any legal infirmity requiring this

Court's interference.

9. This writ application is, in our view, devoid of Patna High Court CWJC No.1845 of 2023 dt.14-02-2023

merit and accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, ACJ)

( Madhuresh Prasad, J) Sunil/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          18.02.2023
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter