Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 740 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1041 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7113 of 2011
======================================================
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Director, Madhyamik Shiksha, Government of Bihar, Buddha Marg, Patna- 800001.
... ... Appellant/s Versus Keshari Nandan Singh, S/o Late Shambhu Prasad Singh, Acting Headmaster, Shri Vidya Sundar High School, Amlori Sarsar, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Siwan.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, AC to AAG- 4 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate Ms. Prakritita Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 10-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. The appellant State has assailed the order of the
learned Single Judge dated 20.06.2016 passed in CWJC NO.
7113 of 2011. There is a delay of 743 days in filing Letters
Patent Appeal.
3. Perusal of the grounds for condonation of delay
sufficient cause has not been shown except stating that file was
being tossed from one office to another office. Such a
reasonings are not sufficient to come to the conclusion that Patna High Court L.P.A No. 1041 of 2018 dt.10-02-2023
sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay of 743
days. It is to be noted that it is State appeal and they were well
aware in respect of challenge to the order of the learned Single
Judge, there is a time limit, in such matters State authorities
should have taken appropriate steps in filing Letters Patent
Appeal within the time limit stipulated. Invariably, State
appeals are filed belatedly.
4. Recently in the case of the State of Bihar Vs. The
Vice Chancellor and others (LPA No. 365 of 2021) vide order
dated 04.01.2023, we have made a serious observation and also
directed State to evolve a policy relating to monitoring of cases
by the State irrespective of Letters Patent Appeal or any other
matters.
5. Further on merit the matter is squarely covered by
the decision of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab
and Others Versus Rafiq Masih (White Washer) reported in
(2015) 4 SCC 334, which has been taken note of by the learned
Single Judge, despite the fact that the matter is covered by Apex
Court decision State has proceeded to file present Letters Patent
Appeal. Therefore, we have to draw inference that the present
Letters Patent Appeal is frivolous and it is not issue relating to
question of law, so as to entertain Letters Patent Appeal by Patna High Court L.P.A No. 1041 of 2018 dt.10-02-2023
condoning the delay.
6. Accordingly, interlocutory application no. 5616 of
2018 for condonation of delay of 743 days stands rejected.
7. In the result, Letters Patent Appeal stands
dismissed.
8. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
(Harish Kumar, J) uday/shivank-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 15.02.2023 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!