Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 730 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3339 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
MERAJ ANSARI SON OF AJAJUL ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJOPATTI MILL TOLA, WARD NO. 18, P.S. MEHSAUL, DISTRICT SITAMARHI FOR HIS MINOR CHILD IRFAN ANSARI UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS FATHER MERAJ ANSARI (CHILD IN CONFLICT WITH LAW)
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ramchandra Singh, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 09-02-2023
Mr. Subodh Kumar and Mr. Karandeep Kumar,
learned counsels appearing for the appellant and Mr.
Ramchandra Singh, learned APP appearing for the State are
present and they are heard.
The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant,
namely, Meraj Ansari, through his father, against the order
dated 10.08.2022 passed by learned Children Court-cum-
Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Sitamarhi in connection
with Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No.5/2021 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 376, 504 and 506 of the
Indian Penal Code, whereby the prayer for bail made by the
appellant has been rejected.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3339 of 2022 dt.09-02-2023
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant
that the appellant has been declared the child in conflict with
law and on the alleged day of occurrence, his age was 16 years
10 months and 23 days. The allegation made in the FIR is totally
false as admittedly the informant is much older than appellant
and as per the FIR itself, the informant is a married lady having
two children from her former husband. So, in such a situation
and in light of such difference of age between the appellant and
informant, it is not believable that the appellant forcefully
established sexual relationship with the informant and moreover
the appellant has been languishing in the observation home
since 16.11.2021 and there are sufficient major persons in his
family and the grounds taken by the learned children's court
while rejecting the prayer for bail of the appellant, are not
tenable in the light of provisions of Juvenile Justice Act and in
this regard, social investigation report submitted by Probation
Officer filed as Annexure 3 may be perused.
Learned APP appearing for the State has no objection
to the prayer for bail made by the appellant.
I have considered the above submissions and the
nature of allegation appearing from the FIR against the
appellant and social investigation report which shows that in Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3339 of 2022 dt.09-02-2023
the family of the appellant, there are father and mother who can
easily take care of the appellant and mainly on the ground of
appellant being mentally challenged person, it is not proper to
keep the appellant in the observation home continuously as the
same will be against his all round development and there is
also no possibility of the appellant to come in the contact of
known criminals after his release and his release will not defeat
the ends of justice and moreover he has spent considerable
period in the observation home and the grounds taken by the
learned court below in rejecting the prayer for bail of the
appellant do not appear to be proper in the light of the spirit of
Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act in view of the social
investigation report. Accordingly, I find the impugned order to
be improper, hence it stands set aside and the instant appeal
stands allowed and the appellant is directed to be released from
the observation home on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
each by two sureties of his parents to the satisfaction of learned
court below and also on this condition that father of the
appellant shall submit a progress report with regard to
educational and social development of appellant in trial court
after every three months during the trial of appellant and if any
adverse thing to said development of the appellant is found then Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3339 of 2022 dt.09-02-2023
the court below shall take strict action against the appellant.
Accordingly, the instant appeal stands allowed.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.02.2023 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!