Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 679 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1443 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1839 of 2019
======================================================
Ribha Kumari @ Ribha Devi, aged 45 years (Female), W/o Satish Kumar Sinha, Ward No.09, Lohiya Nagar, P.O and Dist. Supaul.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director I.C.D.S. Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Collector, Supaul.
5. The District Program Officer, I.C.D.S., Supaul.
6. The C.D.P.O., Supaul.
7. Gunja Kumari, W/o Amit Kumar, resident of Ward No. 09, Lohiya Nagar Parisad, P.S. and District - Supaul.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 06-02-2023
Re: I.A. No. 1 of 2019
Heard I.A. No. 1 of 2019 for condonation of delay in
filing the present L.P.A.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1443 of 2019 dt.06-02-2023
2. For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit,
delay of about 244 days in filing the present L.P.A. is condoned,
I.A. No. 1 of 2019 stand allowed.
3. Matter relates to selection and appointment to the post
of Anganwari Sevika. The appellant was a candidate for
recruitment to the post of Anganwari Sevika in Anganwari Center
No. 259 in the District of Supaul. Select list was prepared on
28.06.2013 while placing the appellant at serial No. 5 whereas
respondent No. 7 - Gunja Kumari was placed at serial No. 2.
4. It is learnt that respondent No. 7 - Gunja Kumari's
selection was under cloud, thereafter, her selection and
appointment was cancelled. In the result, official respondent
proceeded to issue fresh advertisement in the year 2016. In this
backdrop, the appellant is seeking selection and appointment to the
post of Anganwari Sevika pursuant to the advertisement made in
the year 2013. It is noticed that appellant has not assailed the
subsequent advertisement issued in the year 2016 whereas
advertisement issued in the year 2016 was for unfilled vacancy
which was notified in the year 2013 and the fact that vacancy
notified in the year 2013 has been carried forward in the light of
State policy decision to the extent that unfilled vacancy is required
to be carried forward to the next recruitment. In this case, Patna High Court L.P.A No.1443 of 2019 dt.06-02-2023
appellant has not assailed the subsequent advertisement so as to
give effect to the advertisement in the year 2013 read with
selection of the appellant and the fact that respondent no. 7 -
Gunja Kumari's selection was nullified.
5. Accordingly, appellant has not made out a case so as
to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge dated
04.02.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1839 of 2019. Hence, present
L.P.A. stands dismissed.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
GAURAV S./-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.02.2023 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!