Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Jay Shree Tea And Industry ... vs The Hindustan Petroleum ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3741 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3741 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2023

Patna High Court
M/S Jay Shree Tea And Industry ... vs The Hindustan Petroleum ... on 16 August, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       REQUEST CASE No.22 of 2023
     ======================================================

M/s Jay Shree Tea and Industry Limited proprietor of Majhaulia Sugar Industries, having its registered office and head office at Industry House, 15th Floor, 10 Chemic Street Calcutta- 700017 and the Mill is situated in District of West Champaran, Bihar - 845454 represented through its Authorized Signatory and Deputy General Manager (Commercial), namely Upendra Nath Rai, Gender Male aged about 60 years Son of Late Chandrika Rai, resident of New Bajranj Nagar, Ratanpura Ojha Toli, Chapra, Saran - 843101.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Registered Office at 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai 400 020 represented through the Chairman cum Managing Director.

2. The Deputy General Manager (I/C) O and D, NCZ, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited TC 13, V/V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow- 226010.

3. The Depot Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Patna (Bihta New IRD)- 801103.

4. The Depot Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Barauni Depot, Papraur, Begusarai- 851210.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Mr. K. Ravish, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-08-2023

The Request Case is for appointment of an Arbitrator

to resolve the dispute arising out of an Agreement produced as

Annexure-1.

Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.22 of 2023 dt.16-08-2023

2. The learned counsel for the respondents raises an

objection insofar as the arbitration clause having a clause in

which the Courts in the city where the purchase order is issued

having jurisdiction to entertain any application or other

proceedings in respect of anything arising under this Agreement.

The purchase order is produced as Annexure-P/7 along with the

supplementary affidavit which is issued from Lucknow and

hence, the petitioner would have to approach the Courts in

Lucknow.

3. The arbitration clause in Agreement has two

distinct clauses which are extracted hereunder:

"The language of the proceedings will be in English and the place of proceedings will be at the State Capital of the Purchaser's location where Ethanol under current Agreement was being received.

The parties hereby agree that the Courts in the city of .... (Place from where PO is issued) alone shall have jurisdiction to entertain any application or other proceedings in respect of anything arising under this Agreement and any Award or Awards made by the Sole Arbitrator hereunder shall be filed, if required, in the concerned Courts."

4. Hence, while the first of the above extracts

provide for an arbitration to be in the State Capital of the

Purchaser's location, the second clause makes the Courts in the

city of the place from the purchase order is issued, to have

jurisdiction to entertain any application or other proceedings Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.22 of 2023 dt.16-08-2023

under the agreement. Hence, both these places ought to be

considered to have jurisdiction to proceed with the arbitration.

The purchaser-respondent receives Ethanol within the State of

Bihar.

5. As such, with the consent of the parties, Hon'ble

Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha, former Judge of the Patna High

Court, is appointed as learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all

disputes arising out of agreement entered into between the

parties to the lis.

6. All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open

to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.

7. Learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per

the Schedule of the Act.

8. Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of

the year 2020, the hearing be expedited.

9. Parties undertake to fully cooperate and not take

any unnecessary adjournment.

10. The issue of limitation, if any, is left open to be

raised before the learned Arbitrator.

11. Joint Registrar (List) is directed to

communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.

12. Learned counsel for the parties also undertake Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.22 of 2023 dt.16-08-2023

to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.

13. Parties shall file their statement of claims

before the learned Arbitrator on such date of hearing which he

may fix, as per mutual convenience.

14. The Request Petition stands disposed of in the

above terms.

15. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) Sunil/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          17.08.2023
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter