Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nandu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 2901 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2901 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 May, 2022

Patna High Court
Nandu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.229 of 2021
     ======================================================

Nandu Kumar Son of Late Brmdev Singh Resident of Village Budhan Bigha, P.S. Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through The Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Minor Water Resource Department, Jal Bhawan, Riding Road, Shekhpura, Patna- 14.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Jal Bhawan, Riding Road, Shekhpura, Patna- 14.

6. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Aurangabad.

7. The District Magistrate, Cum Chairman the District Compassionate Committee, Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anirban Kundu, SC 24 Ms. Shally Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-05-2022

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief/reliefs:

"That the Petitioner prefers present writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the decision of the District Magistrate cum Chairman, The District compassionate committee, Aurangabad vide letter No. 428 dated 08.07.2020 Patna High Court CWJC No.229 of 2021 dt.17-05-2022

by which his application for appointment on Compassionate ground has been rejected as Contained in Annexure- 3 of the present writ petition and for any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is entitle by this Hon'ble Court."

3. On 29.03.2022, following order was passed:

"None appears for the petitioner.

Short question for consideration in the present petition is whether petitioner is entitled to appoint on compassionate ground or not?

Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that petitioner is not entitled to compassionate appointment for the reasons that one of his brother is already in government service. In order to deny compassionate appointment to a person whose brother is already in service it is necessary to peruse the relevant compassionate appointment rules in order to verify the eligibility criteria. Therefore, the State counsel is hereby directed to furnish the relevant portion of the compassionate appointment Rules/Scheme.

Re-list this matter on 05.04.2022."

4. Today learned counsel for the State pointed out from

the Guidelines dated 10.05.2010 issued by the State

Administration. If anyone of the kith and kin of the deceased is

already working in any one of the State Department, in that event,

the other kith or kin is not entitled to compassionate appointment.

Guidelines dated 10.05.2010 reads as under:

Patna High Court CWJC No.229 of 2021 dt.17-05-2022

"General Administration Department's letter

no. 1781 dated 10.05.2010 issued in compliance of the

common order dated 27.07.2004 passed in CWJC No.

6668/2003 and CWJC No. 7044/2003.

"If one of the dependants of deceased

Government Servant (died in harness) is gainfully

employed, in such circumstances other dependant

whether living together or separately, is not entitled for

the benefit of compassionate appointment."

Gainfully employed means an employment, by

which dependants of deceased Govt. servant can be

maintained."

5. Undisputedly, petitioner's brother is already working

in the Police Department, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to

compassionate appointment in the light of the aforesaid Clause in

the Guidelines. That apart, it is to be noted that petitioner has not

questioned the validity of the aforesaid Clause.

6. Accordingly, present petition stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          20.05.2022
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter