Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhola Nath Khan vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 1111 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1111 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Bhola Nath Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 14 February, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21055 of 2021
     ======================================================

Bhola Nath Khan S/o Late Satyanarayan Khan, R/o Village and Post - Bangaon, Ward No.- 5, House No.- 32, Bangaon Nort West Tola, P.S. - Mahishi, District - Saharsha, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Bihar Education Project Council, Patna, through its State Project Director.

4. The District Magistrate, Saharsha, Bihar.

5. The District Programme Officer, Elementary Education and Sarva Siksha Abhiyan Bihar Education Project, Saharsha, Bihar.

6. The District Certificate Officer, Saharsha, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madhaw Pd. Yadaw (Gp23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

Date : 14-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief:-

(I) For issuance of appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari, commanding the respondents not to recover the amount in question from the petitioner and drop the entire certificate proceeding initiated against him.

(ii) For quashing of the letter no.1158 dated 30.12.20 issued under the signature of the respondent no.5 whereby and where under a written requisition has been sent to the respondent no.6 for institution of a certificate case against the petitioner.

(iii) For quashing of the entire certificate proceeding pertaining to Certificate Case (Miscellaneous) Patna High Court CWJC No.21055 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

No.18/2020-21 pending before the District Certificate Officer, Saharsha (the respondent no.6) which has been initiated against the petitioner in violation of the stipulations made in Section 3(6), Section 5 and 6 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914.

(iv) For holding that, since recovery of the alleged amount does not come within the ambit of Public Demand as mentioned in Section 3(6) read with Schedule 1 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 and Article 3 of the Appendix-A of the Board's instruction, it is not a public demand, thereby initiation of the certificate proceeding against the petitioner by the respondent no.6 on the basis of the requisition as contained in letter no.1158 dated 30.12.20 (Annexure -1) is not maintainable in the eye of law and the act of the respondent concern is arbitrary, illegal and discriminatory, in as much as inherently without jurisdiction.

(v) For further holding that since there was / is no dues with the petitioner payable to the Government or its agency, the amount in question is neither recoverable from the petitioner nor can be recovered under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act.

(vi) And also any other appropriate reliefs may be given to the petitioner under the given facts of the case."

It is not in dispute that petition under Section 9 of the

Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914

(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is pending

consideration/petitioner intends to file before the appropriate

authority.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the

instant petition be disposed of with direction to the appropriate

authority to consider and decide the same expeditiously.

Learned counsel for the State states that the

appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petition filed/

to be filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act positively Patna High Court CWJC No.21055 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

within a period of two months from the date of appearance of

the petitioner before him along with a copy of this order and the

issue of limitation shall not come in the way of decision on

merits.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following

terms:-

(a) Petitioner shall appear in the office of the

appropriate authority on 02.03.2022 along with a copy of this

order, on which date documents in support of the petition shall

be filed, or else file a fresh petition under Section 9 of the Act.

(b) The appropriate authority shall consider and

dispose of the petitioner's petition expeditiously, by a reasoned

and speaking order, preferably within a period of two months

from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him and till

then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner;

(c) The authority shall also examine as to whether the

amount in question falls within the definition of public demand

or not;

(d) Needless to add, while considering such petition,

principles of natural justice shall be followed and due

opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties;

Patna High Court CWJC No.21055 of 2021 dt.14-02-2022

(e) Order assigning reasons shall be supplied to the

parties;

(f) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take

recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available

in accordance with law;

(g) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes

recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law,

before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in

accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch;

(h) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the

order passed by the appropriate authority, before the appropriate

forum, if so required and desired.

(i) We have not expressed any opinion on merits. All

issues are left open;

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          16.02.2022
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter