Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4823 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.448 of 2018
======================================================
Sunita Devi, Wife of Shri Harikant Tanti, Resident of Village- Neema (Mubarakpur), Ward No.-5, Panchayat- Sabalbigha, P.O.- Bahramba, Block and P.S.- Sikandara, District- Jamui Bihar.
... ... Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Jamui.
5. District Programme Officer (D.P.O. Jamui,
6. Child Development Project Officer C.D.P.O., Sikandra, Jamui.
7. Lucy Kumari, Wife of Shri Nawal Kumar, Resident of Village- Neema (Mubarakpur), Ward No.-5, Panchayat- Sabalbigha, P.O.- Bahramba, Block and P.S.- Sikandara, District- Jamui ( Bihar).
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv with Mr.Anant Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the State : Mr. S.K.Mandal - SC3
For the Resp. No.7 : Mr. S.P. Parasar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD CAV JUDGMENT Date : 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the private respondent No.7 and learned counsel for
the State.
2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Jamui, on a
complaint made by respondent No.7, has directed the petitioner to
file the admit card, in original based on which, she claims to have
appeared at the Madhyama examination, and also for constitution
of a Medical Board, to ascertain the age of the petitioner (working Patna High Court CWJC No.448 of 2018 dt.06-12-2022
Sevika). This order dated 01.12.2017 is assailed by the petitioner
in the instant proceedings .
3. The brief factual background is that on 19.12.2012,
Center No. 152, Neema Mubarakpur in the Sabal Bigha
Panchayat of Sikandara Block was advertised along with other
centers for selection of Anganwari Sevika and Sahayika. The
petitioner had applied. She was placed in the merit list at 1 st
position having merit marks 72. The respondent No.7 was placed
at Serial No.2 with merit marks 69.8. The Respondent No.7 lodged
a complaint alleging that the petitioner's Madhyama Certificate is
false. The petitioner appeared and the Madhyama certificate was
verified and found to be genuine, as per report of the District
Programme Officer, Jamui, ( for brevity 'DPO' Jamui') dated
21-02-2015, as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition.
4. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Aam Sabha of
the Panchayat on 16.06.2014 where respondent No.7 again
challenged the petitioner's candidature based on Date of Birth. The
DPO, Jamui, thereafter, having considered the fact that the
petitioner's certificate was earlier verified, directed the Child
Development Project Officer, Sikandara ( for short 'CDPO,
Sikandara') that the petitioner's selection can be proceeded with.
Accordingly, the petitioner was issued a selection letter dated Patna High Court CWJC No.448 of 2018 dt.06-12-2022
08-07-2015 and has since been discharging the responsibilities of
Anganwari Sevika for center No. 152.
5. The respondent No.7, on the other hand, continued to
challenge the petitioner's candidature at various levels. She also
filed a Service Appeal No. 51/29 of 2015 before the Deputy
Director, Welfare, Munger, alleging that the petitioner had
obtained selection on the basis of wrong Date of Birth. The appeal
later came to be transferred to Collector, Jamui and the appeal was
dismissed allowing the private respondent No. 7 to approach the
DPO.
6. The respondent No.7, thereafter filed a complaint
before the DPO, Jamui bearing Complaint No.15/2016. The
complaint of the respondent No.7 regarding forged and fabricated
Educational certificate containing wrong Date of Birth was
dismissed. The DPO found that the petitioner's Date of Birth
14-03-1986, recorded in the certificate issued by the Bihar
Sanskrit Shiksha Board bearing No. 0181407 has already been
verified and, therefore, the complaint regarding the certificate and
Date of Birth is without any basis. The complaint was thus,
rejected by the DPO, under order dated 07-04-2017, as contained
in Annnexure-5 to the writ petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.448 of 2018 dt.06-12-2022
7. The DPO's order was assailed before the District
Magistrate-cum- Collector, Jamui, in Service Appeal No. 2 of
2017, wherein, the impugned order directing for ascertaining the
petitioner's age by a Medical Board to be constituted, has been
passed.
8. The learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner has submitted that the issue had already been verified
and verification accepted by the CDPO, Sikandara as well as DPO,
Jamui. In the circumstances, constitution of a Medical Board to
ascertain the age of the petitioner is wholly unwarranted. The
complaints are being made by private respondent on extraneous
consideration repeatedly at all levels. It is also submitted that the
ICDS letter dated 9-5-2012, provides in Clause 1 (ख), as follows:-
"1(ख) जन्म ततितथ/उम्र कका तनिरर्धारण ननमन तिररीकक सक तकयका जकायकगका:-
(i) ममैतट्रिक यका उच्चतिर ययोग्यतिकारकाररी सकतविकका /सहकातयकका करी जन्म ततितथ, उनिकक ममैतट्रिक अथविका समकक पररीकका उतरीणर्ण प्रमकाण -पत्र ममें अअंतकति जन्म ततितथ मकानिका जकायकगका।
(ii) निनिन् ममैतट्रिक सकतविकका/ सहकातयकका कका जन्म ततितथ उनिकक शमैकतणक ययोग्यतिका सम्बन्ररी प्रमकाण -पत्र स्ककल पतरत्यकाग प्रमकाण पत्र कयो मकानिका जकायकगका।
(iii) विमैसरी सकाकर सहकातयकका तजसकक पकास शमैकतणक यका सरककाररी जन्म प्रमकाण -पत्र आतदि उपलब्र नि हयो विमैसक मकामललों ममें आययु कका तनिरर्धारण मकतडिकल बयोडिर्ण दकारका करकायका जकायकगका। "
Patna High Court CWJC No.448 of 2018 dt.06-12-2022
9. As per decision of the ICDS, Directorate, it is the
Matriculation certificate, or equivalent which has to be taken for
determining the Date of Birth/age of the candidate. In the
circumstances, impugned order of the Collector, directing for
constitution of a Medical Board, is unsustainable. Apparently, the
District Magistrate is giving undue advantage to Respondent No.7.
Since the Date of Birth stands verified on the basis of petitioner's
Madhyama certificate, as per decision dated 09-05-2012 of the
I.C.D.S, Directorate, there is no requirement whatsoever, for
constitution of a Medical Board.
10. The learned State counsel, on the other hand,
submits that as per petitioner's Date of Birth recorded in
Madhyama certificate and her daughter's Date of Birth recorded
in her Matriculation certificate, the age gap of the petitioner with
her daughter is 08 years only, which appears to be highly
improbable, to say the least. It is, under such circumstance, that the
Collector, has considered it appropriate for Constitution of a
Medical Board to ascertain the petitioner's age.
11. On consideration of the rival submissions, this Court
would take notice of the fact that the age gap of the petitioner with
that of her daughter being 08 years only based on age recorded in
their respective certificates, is not a fact in dispute. In view of Patna High Court CWJC No.448 of 2018 dt.06-12-2022
such unique circumstance, this Court would observe that the order
of the District Magistrate, directing for constitution of a Medical
Board for ascertaining the petitioner's age for the limited purposes
of process of selection in-question, appears to be the only fair
resolution available. The exercise being undertaken, would only be
for the limited purposes of the process of selection in question.
With this clarification, this Court, based on the reasons and
discussion made above, does not find any reason to interfere with
the impugned order dated 01-12-2017 passed by the Collector in
Service Appeal No. 2 of 2017, as contained in Annexure-7 to the
writ petition.
12. The writ petition is dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
AFR/NAFR AFR CAV DATE 20-09-2022 Uploading Date 21-12-2022 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!