Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Puran Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 4420 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4420 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021

Patna High Court
Puran Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 2 September, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.533 of 2021
             Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2020 Thana- SC/ST District- Khagaria
     ======================================================

1. Puran Yadav, Son of Sitaram Yadav, R/o village- Chukati, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria

2. Sulekha Devi, W/o Puran Yadav, R/o village- Chukati, P.S.- Mansi, District-

Khagaria ... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Siddhartha Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-09-2021 Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to

withdraw this appeal, as appellant no. 1, namely, Puran Yadav, has been

arrested by the police.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with

respect to appellant no.1, Puran Yadav.

4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant no.2, namely,

Sulekha Devi, and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

through Video Conferencing.

5. This appeal, under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, is directed

against the order dated 07.11.2020 passed in Spl. A.B.A. (SC/ST) No.

37 of 2020, whereby and whereunder the learned Ist Additional

Sessions Judge, Khagaria, rejected the prayer of pre-arrest bail of the Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.533 of 2021 dt.02-09-2021

appellant no.2, Sulekha Devi, in connection with Khagaria SC/ST P.S.

Case No. 09 of 2020, registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 307,

354(A), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(a)(R)(S)

(W) and 3(2)(Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

6. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 06.06.2020, in the

noon, five persons named in the FIR including the appellant no.2,

Sulekha Devi, variously armed with weapons came at the door of the

informant, Ranju Devi, and started to abuse and made query about her

husband, saying to withdraw the case, which was lodged by her

husband. On which, she told that her husband is not present at the house

then all started to cause assault. At that time, Puran Yadav assaulted her

through butt causing injury at her head and his wife, Sulekha Devi

(appellant no.2) gave Kachhia blow causing injury at her finger. When

Punam Devi, Priyanka Devi and Shanti Devi came to save her then they

were also assaulted. At that time, they told that belonging to community

of Khansi how to dare to lodge the case. At that time, Punam Devi

sustained injury at her hand and Suman Yadav caused injury at the head

of Punam Devi through lathi. Bharan Yadav assaulted to Priyanka Devi

through lathi causing injury at her hand. Thereafter, Kailu Yadav laid

down to Shanti Devi on the ground. After occurrence, she gave an

application to Mansi Police Station but the case was not lodged, due to

that reason, she lodged the present case in SC/ST Police Station,

Khagaria.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.533 of 2021 dt.02-09-2021

7. Learned counsel for the appellant no. 2, Sulekha Devi,

submits that while the allegation has been made against the appellant

no. 2 to cause injury through sharp cutting weapon at the finger of the

informant but out of three injuries, injury no. 1 is at her little finger,

which is lacerated in nature not by sharp cutting weapon. The three

injuries are simple in nature. Further submission is that appellant no. 2,

who is lady, has no criminal antecedent.

8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

the order dated 07.11.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I,

Khagaria in Spl. A.B.A.(SC/ST) Case no. 34 of 2020 is set aside and

accordingly, this appeal is allowed.

9. Let the appellant no. 2, Sulekha Devi, be released on bail,

in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Khagaria, in

connection with Khagaria SC/ST P.S. Case No. 09 of 2020, subject to

the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Bhardwaj/-                                                      (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter