Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajiv Ranjan Rai vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 5679 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5679 Patna
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Rajiv Ranjan Rai vs The Union Of India on 30 November, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7215 of 2020
     ======================================================

Rajiv Ranjan Rai Son of Late Satendra Rai, Resident of Village-Maruan, Police Station-Dinara, District-Rohtas (Sasaram).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, New Delhi.

2. Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharat Bhawan 4 and 6 Currimbhoy Road, Balard Estate, Mumbai-400001.

3. The Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, At Pakari, Via Anisabad, Patna-800002.

4. The Assistant General Manager (A.G.M.), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, At Pakari, Via Anisabad, Patna-800002.

5. Dhiraj Kumar, Son of Nirmal Sah, Resident of Village-Jamarodh, P.O.-

Dinara, P.S. Dinara, District Rohtas (Sasaram).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar, Advocate For U.O. I. : Mr.Dr.K.N.Singh (ASG) Mrs. Priyanka Raj Laxmi, Advocate For B.P.C.L. Mr. Sanjay Singh, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No. 5 Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 30-11-2021

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

"(i) For proper disposal of my complaint dated 18.07.2019 against selected candidate Dhiraj Kumar for Retail Outlet Dealership Group-1, Location No. 149 on the avail of given necessary condition within 3 Kilometer from Dinara Zero Mile toward Dhansoin on Dinara-Dhansoin Road.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7215 of 2020 dt.30-11-2021

(ii) For holding and declaring that allotment of Petrol Station to the Private Respondent for Retail Outlet dealership Group-1, Location Non 149 is not in accordance with law and need to be interfered with as distance of the allotted location is at 4.2 Km instead of 3 K.m. from Dinara Zero Mile.

(iii) For direction on respondent that petitioner is one of the three applicants and filed complaint before Respondent no. 3 alongwith Bank Drafts of Rs. 5000/- as required charge and still interested to get an opportunity of allotment of the Petrol Station and he is intitle for that.

(iv) For any other relief/reliefs to which petitioner is found entitle, in the facts and circumstances of the case."

On a pointed query put to Shri Sanjay Singh,

learned Senior Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2, namely

Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Petroleum

Corporation Limited, as to why petitioner's complaint was kept

pending and not decided, we are informed that certain queries

were put to the petitioner which remain unresponded.

Petitioner challenges the allotment made by

Respondent No. 2, namely Chairman and Managing Director,

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, in favour of Respondent

No. 5, namely Dhiraj Kumar.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we Patna High Court CWJC No.7215 of 2020 dt.30-11-2021

are of the considered view that all questions of fact, more so

with regard to the issue as to whether the site allotted met with

the condition of territorial limits or not is to be decided first by

the authority empowered to decide the grievances/complaints

against such allotment.

Shri Saroj Kumar, learned counsel for the

petitioner, states that within one week petitioner shall make

himself available in the office of Grievances Redressal Forum

on 21st of December, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. and also submit all

papers as required by the Respondent No. 2 company.

Shri Sanjay Singh, learned Senior Counsel for

Respondent No. 2, states that the officer authorized to decide the

complaint shall positively take a decision within a period of four

weeks from the date of its presentation.

Needless to add, while considering such complaint,

principles of natural justice shall be complied with and the

authority pass a reasoned and speaking order, copy whereof

shall be supplied to all concerned.

All issues of fact and law are left open.

Liberty reserved to the parties to take recourse to

such other remedies as are otherwise available, should the need

so arise.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7215 of 2020 dt.30-11-2021

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand

disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J)

K.C.Jha/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          03.12.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter