Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brambhdeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5585 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5585 Patna
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Brambhdeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 29 November, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6111 of 2020

     ======================================================

1. Brambhdeo Sah Son of Late Kailu Sah. Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

2. Indradeo Sah, Son of Late Kailu Sah. Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

3. Sikandar Sah, Son of Late Kailu Sah. Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

4. Gopal Sah, Son of Late Kailu Sah. Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

5. Sambhunath Sah, Son of Late Baldeo Sah, Resident of Village-

Rannuchak, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

6. Arjun Sah, Son of Late Baldeo Sah, Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

7. Tuntun Sah, Son of Domi Sah, Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

8. Anant Sah, Son of Domi Sah, Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.-

Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

9. Suresh Sah, Son of Late Ram Kishun Sah, Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

10. Pramod Sah, Son of Late Ram Kishun Sah, Resident of Village-

Rannuchak, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

11. Arun Sah, Son of Late Ram Kishun Sah, Resident of Village- Rannuchak, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt.

of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Collector, Bhagalpur.

3. The Additional Collector, Land Reforms Department, Bhagalpur.

4. The Senior Deputy Collector, Bhagalpur.

5. The Circle Officer, Nathnagar.

6. Amit Kumar Roy, Son of Chandrika Roy, resident at Village- Makandpur, P.S. Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

7. Anuj Kumar Roy, Son of Chandrika Roy, resident at Village- Makandpur, P.S. Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondents Patna High Court CWJC No.6111 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-11-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners

hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp

Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all

defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one

month hereof.

2. The present petition has been filed "for quashing of the

order dated 02.09.2019 passed in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No.

64/2019-20 passed by Additional Collector, Bhagalpur whereby and

whereunder respondent no. 3 rejected the case of the petitioners only

due to delay consumed in filing of jamabandi cancellation case

though jamabandi number 259 and 260 has been wrongly carved out

from original jamabandi no 134; further directs to respondent to

restore the original jamabandi showing both the plot no. 9 for an

area of 10 decimal and plot no 10 for an area of 11 decimal are part

and parcel of original jamabandi no 134; and further direct to

respondent no. 5 to issue rent receipt in favour of petitioners for an

entire area or 21 decimal appertaining to original jamabandi no.

134."

Patna High Court CWJC No.6111 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021

3. At the outset itself, learned counsel for the respondents

raises a preliminary objection on the grounds of availability of

alternative remedy by way of appeal against the impugned order

provided under Section 9 (6) of the Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute

the above proposition.

5. In the above view of the matter, this Court is not

inclined to enter into the merits of the claim of the petitioner. The

writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail of

alternative remedy in accordance with law.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are

removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by

the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1

hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice

of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//-

AFR/NAFR              NAFR
CAV DATE              N.A.
Uploading Date        02.12.2021
Transmission Date     N.A.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter