Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhola Prasad Sah vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5405 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5405 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Bhola Prasad Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 23 November, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6733 of 2020
     ======================================================

Bhola Prasad Sah S/o Late Singheshwar Prasad Sah R/o Village-Ballochak, Police Station-Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman/Managing Director, Bihar, Patna.

3. The General Manager Cum Executive Engineer, Mithila Electricity Supply Division, Darbhanga.

4. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Dalsingsarai Circle-Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur.

5. The Electrical Superintendent Engineer, Electricity Supply, District-

Samastipur.

6. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electricity Supply Sub Division, Dalsingsarai

7. The District Consumer Forum, through its member Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Roy, G.P.-1 Mr. Suresh Kumar, AC to GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

"(i) For issuance of an appropriate order, direction or writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing order dated 25.01.2020 passed in Case No. 195/12 (Annexure-11) by learned District Consumer Forum, Samastipur, whereby Patna High Court CWJC No.6733 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

and whereunder the prayer of petitioner for connection/modification of electricity bill, starting of his house Electricity connections and compensation Rs. 81,000/- thousand has been rejected.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate order, direction or writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents to correct/modify the electricity bill and starting of his house electricity connection (Supply) and pay reasonable compensation to petitioner for his financial, mental, litigation suffering due to deficiency in service of the respondents.

(iii) For any other relief or reliefs for which petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under instructions,

states that petitioner may be permitted to prefer an appeal

against the impugned order before the Appellate Authority.

Permission granted.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that if

such an appeal is preferred within a period of four weeks from

today, the issue of limitation, if any, shall neither be raised nor

allowed to come in the way of adjudication of the appeal on

merits.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6733 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following

mutually agreeable terms:-

(a) Petitioner is permitted to prefer an appeal within

a period of four weeks from today;

(b) In the event of appeal being preferred within a

period of four weeks from today, the issue of limitation shall not

come in the way of adjudication of the appeal on merits;

(c) Opportunity shall be granted to the parties to

place on record all essential documents and materials, if so

required and desired;

(d) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to

fully cooperate and not take unnecessary adjournment;

(e) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal

on merits, in compliance of the principles of natural justice;

(f) The Appellate Authority shall pass a reasoned and

speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of

filing of the appeal copy whereof be supplied to the parties;

(g) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take

recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in

accordance with law;

(h) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes Patna High Court CWJC No.6733 of 2020 dt.23-11-2021

recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law,

before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in

accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch;

(i) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and

all issues are left open;

(j) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the

order, if required and desired.

The instant petition sands disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed

of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

(S. Kumar, J)

Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 26.11.2021 Transmission Date

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter