Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Sanjay Printing Works vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5356 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5356 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021

Patna High Court
M/S Sanjay Printing Works vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20242 of 2019
     ======================================================

M/s Sanjay Printing Works Through its Partner Nawin Chandra Jaiswal, Male, aged about 61 years, son of Late (Dr.) Mathura Prasad Jaiswal, resident of mohalla- Gurhatta, P.S. Khajekalan, Patna City, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Managing Director Bihar State Text Book Publishing Corporation Limited (undertaking of the Government of Bihar) Pathya Pustak Bhawan, Budha Marg, Patna- 800001.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.M.K. Sinha, Sr. Adv Mr.Ajay Prasad, Adv Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Adv For the respondent no.3 : Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriyar, Adv For the State : Mr.Kameshwar Kumar (GP17) Mr. Arbind Kumar, AC to GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 22-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

"That this writ application is for quashing the order th dated 29 August 2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3, Managing Director, Bihar State Text Book Publishing Corporation Limited, which has been communicated to the petitioner vide Letter No. 3063 dated 30.08.2019 whereas the order of the petitioner vide Order No. 2717 dated 21.03.2019 has been cancelled with immediate effect as well as also debarred from empanelment from the list as well as Kandika

-14 and further the petitioner firm is blacklisted for the period of ten years without any opportunity of hearing, therefore the order passed by the Respondent No. 3 is wholly Patna High Court CWJC No.20242 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

without jurisdiction."

After the matter was heard for sometime Mr. V.M.K.

Sinha, learned senior counsel, confines the scope of the

petitioner only with respect to the quantum of period for which

the petitioner stands blacklisted, disabling him from

participating in the award of printing works of Bihar State

Textbook Publishing Corporation Ltd. With the impugned notice

dated 30.08.2019, petitioner stand debarred for the period of 10

years.

Given the attending facts and circumstances, we find

the quantum to be highly disproportionate, more so, for the

reason that the allegations emanating from the record with

respect to petitioner's misconduct is only on two counts:-

(a) He did not complete the work of printing the books

within the specified period;

(b) He got some of the books published/printed from

unauthorized printers.

Petitioner invites our attention to the previous litigation

with respect to the earlier contracts in relation to which several

orders came to be passed by this Court though not averred, but

orally argued the impugned action is a result of initiation of such

proceeding.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20242 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

While we do not express opinion on this aspect of the

matter, but do find that in relation to the period of 3 years for

which the petitioner was awarded work, he successfully

completed the work in terms of the specifications enumerated in

the tender as also the subsequent instructions stipulated in the

work order. It is in these circumstances, we find to be persuaded

to arrive at a conclusion of the order debarring the petitioner for

a period of 10 years to be grossly disproportionate to the

alleged misconduct. The order was passed on 30.08.2019, no

work stands allotted to the petitioner since then.

Petitioner has already suffered for a period of two

years. Ordinarily, we would have closed the matter here itself by

accounting such period for the purposes of passing the order

with respect to the period of blacklisting but, however, we

refrain from doing so, particularly when we are informed that

there is change in the management of the institution, and as such

remand the matter back to the respondent no. 3 namely the

Managing Director Bihar State Text Book Publishing

Corporation Limited, for taking a decision afresh, only on the

issue of quantum for the period for which the petitioner would

be debarred for the purposes of participating in the work of

Bihar State Textbook Publishing Corporation Ltd.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20242 of 2019 dt.22-11-2021

The petitioner shall appear before the authority on

06.12.2021, and place additional material in support of his

contentions.

We expect the authority to pass the order,

dispassionately, in accordance with law, within a period of four

weeks thereafter.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the court,

if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent

cause of action.

The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

(S. Kumar, J)

ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter