Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Maheshwar Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5216 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5216 Patna
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Sri Maheshwar Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 November, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9285 of 2020
     ======================================================

Sri Maheshwar Prasad Yadav, son of Sri Radhy Yadav, resident of Village- Lthnay, P.O.- Koriya, P.S.- Chandan, Distt.- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Dept. of Food and Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Banka, Distt.- Banka.

4. The District Magistrate Banka, Distt.- Banka.

5. The Block Supply Officer Banka, Distt.- Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritam Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG 5 with Md. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA)

Date : 15-11-2021

Heard.

The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated

05.05.2020 by which the PDS license of the petitioner bearing

No. 48of 2012 has been cancelled by the Sub Divisional Officer,

Banka.

Though the order is appeallable under Rule 32(iii) of

the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016, but no appeal was preferred by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9285 of 2020 dt.15-11-2021

We feel that the matter needs to be heard by the

competent authority. The limitation prescribed under the Rule

for preferring the appeal has expired. The State has no serious

objection in case the petitioner files an appeal.

We, thus, dispose off this writ petition with a direction

that in case the petitioner prefers an appeal against the order

impugned within two weeks, the competent authority will

decide the same within four weeks without being impeded by

the issue of limitation.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Rajan Gupta, J)

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

J. Alam/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date       20.11.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter