Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Umashankar Ray vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 2133 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2133 Patna
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2021

Patna High Court
Umashankar Ray vs The State Of Bihar on 27 May, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.421 of 2021
     ======================================================

1. Umashankar Ray S/o Saudagar Ray R/o Bokane Kala, Bokane Kalan, P.s.-

Patahi, East Champaran, Bokane Kala, Bihar-845414

2. Anand Mohan S/o Vakil Puri R/o Bokane Kala, Bokane Kalan, P.S.- Patahi, East Champaran, Bokane Kala, Bihar-845414

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Departmment, Government of Bihar

3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari

4. The Circle Officer, Patahi, East Champaran, Bihar

5. The Block Development Officer, Patahi, East Champaran, Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mayuri, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

Date : 27-05-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):-

"That this is an application on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to direct the respondent authority to forthwith stop the construction of the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan in Bokane Kala Panchayat, District East Champaran as it is completely in violation of guidelines issued on 03.06.2019 and any further construction would lead to more wastage of the public resources. (Annexure-1).

Patna High Court CWJC No.421 of 2021 dt.27-05-2021

That this is an application on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to direct the respondent authority to forthwith take all necessary immediate steps to ensure that the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan is constructed in accordance with the guidelines framed by the Department of Panchayati Raj vide Memo dated 03.06.2019.

To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to direct the respondent authority to show cause as to why despite several protests by the Panchayat Samiti and villagers proper survey of the land was not done before commencing the construction of the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan.

To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to order the respondent authorities to take essential steps against the erring office bearers who due to their own vested interest caused huge loss to the state exchequer.

To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s0, order(s), direction(s) to order the respondent authorities to ensure that the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan is constructed in an area which fulfills the criteria laid down by the Government."

After the matter was heard for sometime, learned

counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioner shall be content

if a direction is issued to the respondent no. 3 District

Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, to consider and

decide the representation with respect to grievances raised in

such representation.

Learned counsel for the respondent states that if such

representation is filed before the respondent no. 3 District Patna High Court CWJC No.421 of 2021 dt.27-05-2021

Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, same shall be

considered and decided within a period of two months from the

date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

Equally liberty is reserved to the petitioners to take

recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available

in accordance with law.

Liberty reserved to petitioners to approach the court, if

the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent

cause of action.

The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

(S. Kumar, J)

ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          29.05.2021
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter