Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2381 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23657 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2020 Thana- ISMAILPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Mila Devi, aged about 35 F, wife of Ashok Mandal, R/O Village- Navtoliya Sudan Tola, P.S.- Ismilepur, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 14-06-2021
The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis
of motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on
10.06.2021, which was allowed.
3. Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
Ismailpur PS Case No. 82 of 2020 dated 31.10.2020, instituted
under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code
and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
5. The allegation against the petitioner is that she,
along with two others, had come to the spot where her husband, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23657 of 2021 dt.14-06-2021
son and another person had assaulted the informant, her father
and her mother leading to the death of the father of the
informant and bullet injury to the mother of the informant and
also to the informant.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
just because her husband and son have been made accused and
specific overt acts have been attributed to them, the petitioner
has also been implicated, though totally without any basis. It
was submitted that even if the allegation is accepted at its face
value, the only allegation is that she along with two other
persons was also present at the spot when the incident had
occurred. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner, besides
being a lady, has no criminal antecedent.
7. Learned APP submitted that the husband and son of
the informant had fired leading to death of the father of the
informant. However, it was not controverted that, as per the
prosecution story, the petitioner was only present at the time of
incident.
8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in
the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within
six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23657 of 2021 dt.14-06-2021
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the S.D.J.M., Naugachia, Bhagalpur, in Ismailpur PS Case No.
82 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section
438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further (i)
that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner,
and (ii) that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Court and
police/prosecution. Failure to cooperate shall lead to
cancellation of her bail bonds.
9. It shall also be open for the prosecution to bring any
violation of the foregoing conditions of bail by the petitioner, to
the notice of the Court concerned, which shall take immediate
action on the same after giving opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner.
10. The application stands disposed off in the
aforementioned terms.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
J. Alam/-
AFR/NAFR U T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!