Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3360 Patna
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12095 of 2021
Arising Out of PS Case No.-237 Year-2020 Thana- NANPUR District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Md. Rabbani @ Rabbani, aged about 31 years, Male Son of Md. Bhikhari @ Md. Matin Ansari, Resident of Village - Raepur, PS- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Arif, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-07-2021
The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis of
motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on
08.07.2021, which was allowed.
3. Heard Mr. Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
(hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
Nanpur PS Case No. 237 of 2020 dated 28.06.2020, instituted
under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.
5. The allegation against the petitioner, based on the
confessional statement of co-accused Rajkumar Sahni, who was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12095 of 2021 dt.13-07-2021
caught by the police along with firearms, is that he was also in the
group which was moving in Raepur Bazar with firearms.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
person who was caught has taken the name of the petitioner
without there being any connection or any recovery made from his
house. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has clean
antecedent and furthermore, no incident has occurred and before
that the police had caught Rajkumar Sahni and it is alleged that
two persons, including the petitioner had managed to run away.
7. Learned APP submitted that the person who was
caught with firearms has named the petitioner as one of the
persons who was with him.
8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the
event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six
weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned SDJM, Pupri at Sitamarhi in Nanpur PS Case No. 237 of
2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that one of the
bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12095 of 2021 dt.13-07-2021
petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good
behaviour of the petitioner, (iii) that the petitioner shall also give
an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any
illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses
and (iv) that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Court and the
police/prosecution. Any violation of the terms and conditions of
the bonds or the undertaking or failure to cooperate shall lead to
cancellation of his bail bonds.
9. It shall also be open for the prosecution to bring any
violation of the foregoing conditions of bail by the petitioner, to
the notice of the Court concerned, which shall take immediate
action on the same after giving opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner.
10. The application stands disposed off in the
aforementioned terms.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!