Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shyam Mohan Sharma vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 3217 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3217 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2021

Patna High Court
Shyam Mohan Sharma vs The State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2021
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No 360 of 2021
   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2000 Thana- DEOKUND District- Aurangabad
======================================================

SHYAM MOHAN SHARMA Son of Late Ram Ratan Sharma Resident of Village- Senari, P.S.- Banshi, District- Arwal.

... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr Shivendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Binay Krishna, Special PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 09-07-2021

This case has been listed today for consideration through

Video Conferencing.

2 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the

learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

3 The appellant has preferred the present Appeal under

Section 14 - A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for brevity, SC/ST Act) against the

refusal of his prayer for regular bail vide order dated 03.11.2020

passed in BP No 639 of 2020 by Additional Sessions Judge I,

Aurangabad in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,

341, 343, 326, 307, 302, 120B of Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.360 of 2021 dt.09-07-2021

Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act

in connection with Deokund Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case

No 23 of 2000.

4 There is an allegation that 21 named accused persons

and hundreds of unknown persons have indulged in a mass killing

based on some caste rivalry.

5 It is submitted by the appellant's counsel that

appellant is not one of the 21 named persons. About 80 to 90

persons, including 20 injured persons, have been examined. Only

one has named the appellant. Even as per statement of this person

made at paragraph 80 of case diary, at best, appellant was coming

to the village at the time of occurrence. Several persons, who

faced the trial, have been acquitted. The appellant was suddenly

arrested on 13.02.2020 and, thereafter, he came to know that he

too has been implicated in this case. Several accused persons have

already been granted bail, as per details mentioned in the

supplementary affidavit filed by the appellant. It is further

submitted that the appellant has no other antecedents.

6 Learned Special PP has opposed the prayer for bail. It

is submitted that it is a mass killing. He, however, is not in a

position to deny or dispute the submission of the appellant's Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.360 of 2021 dt.09-07-2021

counsel that there is only one person who stated about the

appellant and that he was coming towards the village.

7 In my opinion, in view of nature of accusation in the

First Information Report, and submission of parties, a case for

grant of regular bail is made out. The impugned order dated

03.11.2020 passed in BP No 639 of 2020 requires interference by

this Court, which is, accordingly, set aside.

8 This appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated

03.11.2020 passed in BP No 639 of 2020 by Additional Sessions

Judge I, Aurangabad in connection with Deokund PS Case No 23

of 2000 is set aside.

9 Let the appellant above named be released on bail on

his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Additional Sessions Judge I, Aurangabad in Deokund PS Case No

23 of 2000 subject to the following conditions:

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

appellants who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the appellant. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the

appellant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.360 of 2021 dt.09-07-2021

(2) That the appellant will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                    NA
Uploading Date          10.07.2021
Transmission Date       10.07.2021
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter