Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3122 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Request Case No. 67 of 2020
======================================================
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Sahay, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Dr. Anand Kuamr, Advocate
====================================================== Patna High Court Request Case No. 67 of 2020 dt. 07-07-2021
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT ===================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice through Video Conferencing from His residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)
Date : 07-07-2021
This application has been moved
seeking appointment of an Arbitrator invoking
the powers of this Court under Section 11(6) of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
There is no dispute about-(a) the
legality, validity and binding effect of the
agreement dated 27.01.2011 entered into
between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence
of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the
existence of dispute(s) arising therefrom.
Parties mutually agree for appointment
of an Arbitrator. In fact, they themselves have
suggested the name of Hon'ble Justice Smt. Nilu
Agrawal (Former Judge of this Court) to
adjudicate the disputes.
The dispute arises out of execution of
Agreement dated 27.01.2011. The agreement Patna High Court Request Case No. 67 of 2020 dt. 07-07-2021
contained an arbitration clause, whereby the
parties agreed for reference of the dispute inter
se the parties, arising out of the said agreement,
for arbitration as per law.
There is no legal impediment in the
adjudication of the dispute by the learned
Arbitrator.
As such, as jointly prayed for, Hon'ble
Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal (Former Judge of this
Court) is appointed as learned Arbitrator to
adjudicate all disputes arising out of agreement
dated 27.01.2011 entered into between the
parties to the lis.
All pleas and issues raised, on merits,
are left open to be considered and decided by
the learned Arbitrator.
Learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to
fee as per the schedule.
Since the dispute arises out of an
agreement of the year 2011, the hearing be
expedited.
Parties undertake to fully cooperate Patna High Court Request Case No. 67 of 2020 dt. 07-07-2021
and not take any unnecessary adjournment.
The proceedings, during the time of
current Pandemic- Covid-19 shall be conducted
through digital mode, unless the parties
otherwise mutually agree to meet in person i.e.
physical mode.
It is expected of the learned Arbitrator
to decide the issues expeditiously.
Registrar (List) is directed to
communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.
Learned counsel for the parties also
undertake to communicate the order to the
learned Arbitrator. In fact, they volunteered to
appear before him, through digital mode on 2 nd of
August, 2021 and apprise her of the passing of
the order.
Parties shall file their statement of
claims before the learned Arbitrator on such date
of hearing which she may fix, as per mutual
convenience.
The Request Petition stands disposed
of in the above terms.
Patna High Court Request Case No. 67 of 2020 dt. 07-07-2021
Interlocutory Application(s), if any,
shall stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
Sujit/PKP-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.07.2021 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!