Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 79 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19611 of 2019
======================================================
Kamleshwar Prasad Singh S/o Sri Teni Singh Resident of Kasina, P.o.- Gohpur, Garkha, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran at Chhapra
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Rajbanshi Nagar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Rajbanshi Nagar, Patna
3. The Inspector General of Police Muzaffarpur Range, Sutapatti, Pokhraira, Muzaffarpur
4. The Superintendent of Police Muzaffarpur
5. The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K.Verma (Aag3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
2. The present writ application has been preferred by the
petitioner for quashing Office Order No. 108 of 2018 passed by
Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur
whereby he was declared as superannuated from service from
31.03.2018 with a direction to make payment of retrial dues to
the petitioner and also treating the aforesaid period as date of
retirement.
3. However, at the outset learned counsel for the Patna High Court CWJC No.19611 of 2019 dt.07-01-2021
respondents raised objection about the maintainability of the
writ application and submitted that the writ is not maintainable
and fit to be dismissed in view of the fact that writ petitioner has
earlier filed C.W.J.C. No. 8983 of 2017 for the same relief i.e.,
for correction of date of birth as 17.03.1960 in place of
17.03.1958 which was dismissed vide order dated 04.12.2018
and which further stood rejected vide order passed in L.P.A. No.
07/2019 (Annexure-7 and 8 to the writ petition).
4. On perusal of Annexures No. 7 and 8 appended to the
writ application, it is evident that for the similar relief, petitioner
has earlier moved before this Hon'ble Court which has attained
finality vide order dated 16.04.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 7 of
2019.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this
writ petition is dismissed on the ground of res judicata.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Saif/-
AFR/NAFR Uploading Date 11.01.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!