Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagannath Mishra vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 5980 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5980 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2021

Patna High Court
Jagannath Mishra vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 9 December, 2021
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12840 of 2006
======================================================

Jagannath Mishra, Son of Late Shashi Nath Mishra, Resident of Flat No. 204, Jawahar Apartment, New Patliputra Colony, Patna-800013.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Having its registered and head office at 24 Whites Road, Chennai-600014 through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

2. The Chairman cum Managing Director, United India Insurance Company Ltd., 24 Whites Road, Chennai-600014.

3. General Manager cum Appellate Authority, United India Insurance Company Ltd., 24 Whites Road, Chennai-600014

4. Assistant General Manager cum Disciplinary Authority, United India Insurance Company Ltd., 24 Whites Road, Chennai-600014.

5. Commissioner for Departmental Inquiries and Inquiring Authority, Central Vigilance Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Raju Giri, Advocate
For the Respondent/s   :       None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 09-12-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:-

"(i) To issue an appropriate writs/orders/directions, in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the office order dated 31.3.2004 by which the Assistant General Manager cum Disciplinary Authority, in purported exercise of powers under Rule 23(g) of GI(CDA) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'), has removed the petitioner from service and has further ordered for recovery from the petitioner, 50% of Rs.6,89,175.00, also Rs.1271.00 being the double payment received by him for two trips and further Patna High Court CWJC No.12840 of 2006 dt.09-12-2021

Rs.200/- being amount misappropriated by him (as contained in Annexure-10).

(ii) To issue an appropriate writs/orders/directions, in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the office order dated 30.3.2005 by which the General Manager cum Appellate Authority has rejected the appeal preferred by the petitioner in terms of Rule 37(2) and has confirmed the order dated 31.3.2004 passed by the Disciplinary Authority (as contained in Annexure-12).

(iii) To further issue an appropriate writs/orders/directions, in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the office order dated 25.5.2006 by which the Chairman cum Managing Director of the United India Insurance Company Ltd. has rejected the memorial dated 23.8.2005 preferred by the petitioner in terms of Rule 40, thus upholding the order dated 31.3.2004 of the Disciplinary Authority and order dated 30.3.2005 of the Appellate Authority (as contained in Annexure-14).

(iv) To issue an appropriate writs/orders/directions, in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service from the date of his removal with all consequential benefits.

(v) To any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled."

Undisputed facts are that petitioner while working at

Muzaffarpur in the State of Bihar he was subjected to disciplinary

proceedings and it was concluded while he was working at Patna High Court CWJC No.12840 of 2006 dt.09-12-2021

Dhanbad. The initiation of inquiry and conclusion was at Dhanbad

Office.

Dhanbad Office is part and parcel of the Jharkhand

State, therefore, this Court has no territorial jurisdiction. Thus, the

present petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner

to approach appropriate forum. Delay, if any, shall be taken note of

by jurisdictional forum in view of Section 14 of the Limitation

Act. Petitioner is at liberty to file petition at the earliest.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Vikash/-

AFR/NAFR               NAFR
CAV DATE               N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date      N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter