Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kedar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 4335 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4335 Patna
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2021

Patna High Court
Kedar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 37727 of 2020
            Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2020 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui
      ======================================================

1. Kedar Yadav, aged about 58 years, Male.

2. Gorelal Yadav, aged about 56 years, Male, both Sons of Late Somar Yadav @ Somar Gope, Resident of Village - Darkha, PS - Sikandra, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh No. 5, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-08-2021

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, learned counsel for

the petitioners and Mr. Arun Kumar Singh No. 5, learned

Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP')

for the State.

3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with

Sikandra PS Case No. 93 of 2020 dated 09.05.2020, instituted

under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 324 of the

Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.

4. The allegation against the petitioners and others is of

assaulting the informant who had gone to plough his field and in

which one person has received gunshot injuries.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in

the FIR, the allegation against them is general and omnibus of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37727 of 2020 dt.26-08-2021

firing but without any injury caused to any person since the only

injury, which has been caused to the victim Suresh Kumar, who

was the brother of Dhaneshwar Prasad, who is said to be the

owner of the land in question, is specifically attributable to co-

accused Upendra Singh @ Upendra Prasad Singh. It was

submitted that against the petitioners it is only stated that they

were armed with countrymade pistol and firing from the same.

Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners have no other

criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP submitted that as per the allegation, the

petitioners also had countrymade pistol in their hand and had

resorted to firing. However, it was not controverted that no injury

is alleged to have been caused to any person from such firing.

7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, there

being only general and omnibus allegation of petitioners firing

from their countrymade pistol without there being any injury

caused and further they not having any other criminal antecedent,

the Court is inclined to allow their prayer for pre-arrest bail.

8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before

the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be

released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37727 of 2020 dt.26-08-2021

(twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st

Class, Jamui in Sikandra PS Case No. 93 of 2020, subject to the

conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that one of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners and the

bailors shall execute bond and give undertaking with regard to

good behaviour of the petitioners and (iii) that they shall co-

operate with the Court and police/prosecution. Any violation of

the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking or failure

to co-operate shall lead to cancellation of their bail bonds.

9. It shall also be open for the prosecution to bring any

violation of the foregoing conditions by the petitioners, to the

notice of the Court concerned, which shall take immediate action

on the same after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

10. The petition stands disposed of in the

aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

P. Kumar

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter