Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ranjeet Thakur vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 4112 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4112 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2021

Patna High Court
Ranjeet Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2021
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No 1737 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2020 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================

RANJEET THAKUR SON OF SHIV KUMAR THAKUR @ SHIVNATH R/O VILLAGE- DHURUV PAKARI, P.S. KALYANPUR, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN

... ... Appellant/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : M/s Nafisuzzoha, Bal Govind Sharma, Advocates For the I n f o r m a n t : M/s Abhishek Kr, Rashmi Jha, Sharad Kr Verma, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mr Sadanand Paswan, Special PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-08-2021

This case has been listed today for consideration through

Video Conferencing.

2 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, informant

and the learned Special Public Prosecutor (for brevity, Special PP)

appearing for the State of Bihar.

3 The appellant has preferred the present Appeal under

Section 14 - A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for brevity, SC/ST Act) against the

refusal of his prayer for regular bail vide order dated 05.11.2020

passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge, SC/ST

Act, East Champaran, Motihari in a case registered under Sections Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1737 of 2021 dt.16-08-2021

147, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302, 504, 506, 427 of Indian Penal

Code and Sections 3 (1) (r) (s) of SC/ST Act in connection with

Kalyanpur Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case No 163 of 2020

dated 05.07.2020.

4 While co-accused Ramesh Prasad has stabbed the

victim, it is alleged that the appellant was giving cover with help

of a carbine.

5 The learned counsel for the appellant submits that

specific overt act is alleged against Ramesh Prasad of stabbing the

victim. The death of the victim is also on account of stab injuries.

No firearm injury has been suffered by the victim. Co-accused

Anup Das, against whom there is allegation of catching hold of

deceased, has been allowed bail by this Court in Cr Appeal (SJ)

No 1116 of 2021 on 02.03.2021. The appellant is in custody now

fore more than a year, i e, since 13.07.2020. The appellant is also

accused in three more cases, as per details contained in paragraph

6 of the supplementary affidavit.

6 Learned Special PP as well as learned counsel for the

informant have opposed the prayer for bail. It is their submission

that appellant's active participation appears from the narration of

events.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1737 of 2021 dt.16-08-2021

7 In my opinion, in view of nature of accusation in the

First Information Report, and submission of parties, a case for

grant of regular bail is made out. The impugned order dated

05.11.2020 requires interference by this Court, which is,

accordingly, set aside.

8 This appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated

05.11.2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special

Judge, SC/ST Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with

Kalyanpur PS Case No 163 of 2020 dated 05.07.2020 is set aside.

9 Let the appellant above named be released on bail on

his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge, SC/ST Act, East

Champaran, Motihari in Kalyanpur PS Case No 163 of 2020 dated

05.07.2020 subject to the following conditions:

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

appellants who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the appellant. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the

appellant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1737 of 2021 dt.16-08-2021

(2) That the appellant will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                   NAFR
CAV DATE                    NA
Uploading Date           17.08.2021
Transmission Date        17.08.2021
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter