Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4012 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35521 of 2020
Arising out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- East Champaran
======================================================
Arvind Kumar Bhagat, aged about 41 years (Male), Son of Basuki Prasad Bhagat Resident of Muhalla- Shankosai, Road No.1, Dimna Road Mango, Near Durga Mandir, P.S.- Ulidih Mango Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand).
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Prabha Kumari, aged about 33 years (Female), Wife of Arvind Kumar Bhagat Resident of Muhalla- Shankosai, Road No.1, Dimna Road, Mango near Durga Mandir, P.S.- Ulidih Mango, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand), at present residing at the house of her father Late Satyadeo Prasad, Muhalla- Hadi Bazar, Raxaul, P.O. and P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran- 845345 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Md. Arif, APP
For the opposite party no. 2 : Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 09-08-2021
The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi, learned counsel
for the petitioner; Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State and
Mr. Prateek Tandon, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2-
complainant.
3. The petitioner, who is husband of the complainant-
opposite party no. 2, apprehends arrest in connection with Trial
No. 2990 of 2020 arising out of Complaint Case No. 180 of 2019
dated 09.05.2019, instituted under Sections 323, 498-A,374, 307 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35521 of 2020 dt.09-08-2021
of the Indian Penal Code, 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
and 66-A of Information Technology Act, 2000.
4. On 21.06.2021, learned counsel for the petitioner had
submitted that prior to the present case, he had filed Original
Matrimonial Suit No. 194 of 2019 before the Principal Judge,
Family Court, Jamshedpur, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955, for restitution of conjugal rights, in which the
complainant had appeared and after mediation a settlement had
been arrived and one of the terms is that the petitioner would bring
the complainant and her two children and would keep them in the
matrimonial home.
5. Having regard to such stand of the petitioner, the
Court had directed for an exercise by which the petitioner was to
go to the house of the opposite party no. 2 and take her to the
matrimonial home at Jamshedpur for which an Assistant Sub-
Inspector of Police was also to be deputed for ensuring that
everything went well.
6. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that he has filed an affidavit in which it has been stated that the
opposite party no. 2 and her two children had left her parents'
house on 2nd August, 2021 and had reached the matrimonial home
at Jamshedpur on 3rd August, 2021 and they are living there
happily without any complain. The Court had also requested to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35521 of 2020 dt.09-08-2021
learned APP to inform the complainant about the order and also to
ask her as to whether she wanted anything to be conveyed to the
Court.
7. Learned APP submitted that he has talked to the
opposite party no. 2 earlier and today morning also and she has
stated that she is in the matrimonial home along with her children
and there is no grievance, however, she has requested that the
Court may safeguard her interest in future also.
8. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2
submitted that she along with her children has gone to the
matrimonial home and presently things are fine. However, he also
submitted that the Court may put conditions that she may be
secured in future also.
9. Having regard to the aforesaid, as the parties have
finally resumed their conjugal life and living in the matrimonial
home along with their children, the Court is inclined to grant pre-
arrest bail to the petitioner.
10. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender
before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner
be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/-
(twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Raxaul at Motihari in Trial No. 2990 of 2020 arising out of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35521 of 2020 dt.09-08-2021
Complaint Case No. 180 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid
down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
and further, (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of
the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner shall give undertaking
before the Court that the complainant and her children shall be
kept in the matrimonial home with full dignity, honour and
security and all their needs shall be taken care of and that the
complainant shall be free to meet, talk to and visit any person she
desires without any let or hindrance by the petitioner or his family
members. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds
or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
11. It shall also be open for the prosecution and the
complainant-opposite party no. 2/her guardians to bring any
violation of the foregoing conditions by the petitioner, to the notice
of the Court concerned, which shall take immediate action on the
same after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
12. The petition stands disposed of in the
aforementioned terms.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Vikash/-
AFR/NAFR
U
T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!