Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pinki Kumari vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 1948 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1948 Patna
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2021

Patna High Court
Pinki Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8568 of 2020
     ======================================================

Pinki Kumari Wife of Sri Jay Prakash Gupta Resident of Village- Nerthua, P.O.- Pinjora, P.S.- Kako, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Jehanabad.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jehanabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mahboob Ashraf, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 15-04-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondents through video conference. Learned

counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking that all

defects pointed out by the stamp reporter shall be removed, and

compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with

regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay

immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of

the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The writ petition has been filed for the following

reliefs as formulated by the petitioner -

                                "(i)      to      issue        an      appropriate
                                writ/order/direction      in    the     nature      of

Mandamus directing the respondents to issue PDS license in favour of the petitioner for village Nerthua, Gram Panchayat Nerthua, Block-Kako, District Patna High Court CWJC No.8568 of 2020 dt.15-04-2021

of Jehabanad forthwith as the petitioner has fulfilled all the eligibility criteria and the Selection Committee has also approved her name for the PDS dealer.

(ii) To any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner, having been placed at serial no.1 of the merit list and

according to the recommendation of the Block Supply Officer,

was selected by District Level Selection Committee, Jehanabad

for grant of PDS licence for village Nerthua, Gram Panchayat

Nerthua, Block Kako in the district of Jehanabad. However, the

respondents have still not issued the PDS licence in favour of

the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner has sought redressal

by approaching the District Magistrate through SDO, Jehanabad

with her two representations dated 07.01.2019 and 05.03.2019

respectively (Annexures 5 and 6).

4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State appears and

has been heard.

5. Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the

petitioner, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice shall

be met by directing the District Magistrate, Jehanabad to

consider and dispose of the petitioner's representations dated Patna High Court CWJC No.8568 of 2020 dt.15-04-2021

07.01.2019 and 05.03.2019 respectively (Annexures-5 and 6), if

still pending, on their own merits in accordance with law after

grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably

within a period of eight weeks from today. To enable disposal,

the petitioner shall furnish her mobile number and e-mail ID to

the respondents within a week from today.

6. It is made clear that in view of the ongoing Covid- 19

pandemic, any correspondence between the parties may be

made through email and the petitioner shall be at liberty to

request for hearing through video conference.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid

directions.

8. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are

removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made

by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1

hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the

notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J)

HR/-

AFR/NAFR                        NAFR
CAV DATE                        -
Uploading Date                  17.04.2021
Transmission Date               -
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter