Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nirwana Netralya Represented vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 1912 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1912 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021

Patna High Court
Nirwana Netralya Represented vs The State Of Bihar on 8 April, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8448 of 2020
     ======================================================

Nirwana Netralya represented through Arvind Kumar, aged about 42 yrs., male, Son of Wakil Prasad, Residing at Ward no. 40, Maa Tarachandi Road, Atkhambawa, P.S. Sasaram Town, District - Sasaram, Bihar - 821115.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar represented through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Patna, Bihar.

2. The Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti through its C.E.O., 2nd Floor, Secretariat Extension Building, Block 3, Old Secretariat, Patna - 800015.

3. The Deputy Secretary-cum-Administrative Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna - 800014.

4. The Medical Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna - 800014.

5. The Jharkhand State Aarogya Samiti, through its the Deputy Secretary-cum-

Additional Executive Director, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Bipin Bihari, Advocate
     For the State          :     Ms. Kalpana, AC to GA 8
     For the BSSS           :     Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-04-2021

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Bipin Bihari, learned counsel for the

petitioner; Ms. Kalpana, learned AC to GA 8 for the State and

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned counsel for the Bihar Swasthya

Suraksha Samiti (hereinafter referred to as the "BSSS").

3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the

following reliefs:

"(i) To issue a writ of Mandamus or Patna High Court CWJC No.8448 of 2020 dt.08-04-2021

Certiorari by quashing and setting aside thereby Annexure-9 i.e. the impugned office order no.-1573 dated 18-09-2020 issued by the respondent no. 3- The Deputy Secretary-cum-Administrative Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna- 800014 being ultravires as per the statement of the respondent no. -4 (Annexure-10) to the Prime Minister office on 18-09-2020 whereby and where under without having jurisdiction to interfere in the matter of Respondent no. -5 and without getting legal sanction from the Respondent no. -5, the impugned office order no. -1573 dated 18-09- 2020 was issued by the respondent no. -3-The Deputy Secretary-cum-Administrative Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna- 800014 to this petitioner.

(ii) To direct the Respondents particularly the Respondent no. -3 and 4 to produce the legal sanction of the Respondent no.

-5 on the basis of which the impugned office order no. - 1573 dated 18-09-2020 has been issued by the respondent no. 3 to this petitioner on behalf of respondent no. -5.

(iii) To hold and declare the impugned action of the respondents particularly The respondent no. -3- Deputy Secretary-cum- Administrative Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Patna High Court CWJC No.8448 of 2020 dt.08-04-2021

Shekhpura, Patna-800014 as illegal, bad in law as being Ultravires.

(iv) To consequentially direct the respondents particularly The Deputy Secretary- cum-Administrative Officer, Bihar Swasthya Suraksha Samiti, AB-PMJAY, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna-800014 and its official to perform their duties as per the terms of the agreement and to not mislead the statutory authority by way of false submission and to issue show cause notice to Respondent no. -3 and 4 for misleading the statutory authority to conceal their misdeeds.

(v) Any other relief or reliefs which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

4. Having heard the parties, the Court finds that the

order impugned itself stipulates that it was for a period of three

months and due to efflux of time, now nothing further remains

to be adjudicated.

5. Moreover, learned counsel for the BSSS

submitted that if there is any grievance remaining, there is a

provision for the party to move before the State Level Grievance

Redressal Committee which is headed by the Principal Secretary

of the Health Department, Government of Bihar and after that

also there is provision for moving before the National Grievance Patna High Court CWJC No.8448 of 2020 dt.08-04-2021

Redressal Committee, which the petitioner may avail.

6. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition

stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

Anjani/-

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter