Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2118 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No.457 of 2025
Ajit Kumar Patel & others .... Petitioners
Mr. S. S. Pradhan, Advocate
-Versus-
Raj Kishore Patel & others .... Opposite
Parties/Contemnors
Mr. Trilochan Nanda, Advocate
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
09.03.2026 I.A. No.307 of 2026 Order No.
06. 1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties.
2. Instant I.A. is filed by the opposite parties seeking clarification of the Court's order dated 24th April, 2025 in the CMP on the grounds stated.
3. Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that in view of the order of status quo directed while disposing of the CMP, the opposite parties are not able to dispose of the paddy, hence, necessary clarification is sought for. Learned counsel for the petitioners is present and recorded his submission as well. Since the paddy has already been harvested, this Court is of the view that necessary clarification is required as there has been a direction for the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the schedule-B property, as otherwise it would be damaged.
4. Accordingly, it is ordered.
5. The I.A. is disposed of granting liberty for both the parties to dispose of the paddy, procurement of which, by the Local Administration and Mandi Authorities shall not be affected by the order of status quo.
6. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per rules in course of the day.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Sumitra
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!