Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

*** vs State Of Odisha & Others
2026 Latest Caselaw 782 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 782 Ori
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

*** vs State Of Odisha & Others on 30 January, 2026

                 ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

                     WP(C) No.2068 of 2026

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
                            India.



                             ***

Maa Tarini SHG, Bonth represented through its Secretary, Annapurna Malik, At/P.O-Ramakrushnapur District-

     Bhadrak

                                      ...                 Petitioner.

                                 -VERSUS-

     State of Odisha & Others
                                      ...           Opposite Parties.



Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner         : Mr. S.K. Dalei, Advocate


For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

(For the State)

P R E S E N T:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 22.01.2026 :: Date of Judgment : 30.01.2026

J UDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner-

Maa Tarini-WSHG praying for quashing the Office Order dated

03.01.2026 under Annexure-8 issued by the Collector,

Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) relating to the exclusion of the

name of the petitioner-WSHG from the Annexure-7 as a

society/agency for the procurement of paddy of Kharif

Marketing Season 2025-26 of Bonth Block and to declare the

action of the Opp. Parties relating to the exclusion of the name

of the petitioner for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-

26 of Bonth Block as arbitrary and illegal and issue a Writ of

Mandamus directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner-

WSHG to procure Paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Bonth Block in

accordance with the notified policy along with other reliefs, to

which, the petitioner-WSHG is entitled for.

2. The case of the petitioner-WSHG is that, as per the

decision of the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee

(DLPC) for KMS 2025-26, the petitioner-WSHG was selected

as a paddy procurement society/agency of Bonth Block

reflecting the name of the petitioner-WSHG as such, in Serial

No.85 of Annexure-3 indicating its PAC Code No.S2040422.

Thereafter, as per Office Order dated 11.12.2025 issued by the

Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4), a training programme

was conducted and in such training programme, the members

of the petitioner-WSHG successfully completed their training

and demonstrated their preparedness to procure paddy in

compliances with the policy frameworks. Thereafter, on dated

15.12.2025, the authorities distributed paddy procurement

equipments to all the selected WSHGs including the

petitioner-WSHG, to which, the petitioner-WSHG received with

proper acknowledgments.

The above conduct of the Opp. Parties is clearly clarifying

that, petitioner-WSHG was fully equipped in its all respect for

the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Bonth Block.

Nodal Officer was also duly appointed for the smooth progress

of the paddy procurement system by the petitioner-WSHG and

the final list of eligible Women Self Help Groups including the

petitioner-WSHG for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-

26 of Bonth Block was prepared on dated 02.01.2026 as per

Annexure-7, in which, the name of the petitioner-WSHG was

in Sl. No.33, but on its next day, i.e. on 03.01.2026, suddenly,

the same Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) unilaterally

and illegally issued the impugned Office Order vide Annexure-

8 excluding the name of the petitioner-WSHG as an agency for

the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 behind the back

of the petitioner without giving any opportunity of being heard

to the petitioner-WSHG for the exclusion of its name from the

paddy procurement system for KMS 2025-26 and illegally

tagged to the registered farmers of the petitioner with Opp.

Party No.6-WSHG for the paddy procurement for KMS 2025-

26 of Bonth Block.

For which, without, getting any way, the petitioner-

WSHG filed this writ petition against the Opp. Parties praying

for quashing the impugned Letter/Order dated 03.01.2026

vide Annexure-8 issued/passed by the Collector, Bhadrak

(Opp. Party No.4) relating to the exclusion of the name of the

petitioner-WSHG as an agency for the procurement of paddy

for Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 of Bonth Block and to

declare the action of the Opp. Parties as arbitrary and illegal

and to issue a Writ of Mandamus against the Opp. Parties

directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner-WSHG to

procure the paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Bonth Block in

accordance with the notified policy.

3. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the

petitioner & the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

4. The undisputed documents relied by the petitioner vide

Annexures-1 to 7 are going to show that, the petitioner was

selected as a paddy procurement society /agency for KMS

2025-26 of Bonth Block in the District of Bhadrak and its PAC

Code No. was S2040422 and accordingly, as per the Order of

the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4), the members of the

petitioner-WSHG successfully completed the training

programmes for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26

and the equipments for paddy procurement were issued by

the authorities to the petitioner-WSHG. In the final list

prepared by the Opp. Parties on dated 02.01.2026 vide

Annexure-7, the name of the petitioner was reflected by the

Opp. Parties in Sl. No.33 as a paddy procurement

society/agency of Bonth Block for KMS 2025-26, but as per

Letter No.73 dated 03.01.2026 (Annexure-8), the Opp. Party

No.4 eliminated/excluded the name of the petitioner-WSHG

from the paddy procurement system of KMS-2025-26 of Bonth

Block tagging the registered farmers of the petitioner-WSHG

with the Opp. Party No.6 for the procurement of paddy in

place of the petitioner under the following grounds i.e.

"(i). The SHG has no separate purchase center and it is functioning in Ramakrushna GP Office premises.

(ii). The SHG is functioning within 100 mtrs distance from Ramakrushnapur PACS.

(iii) Since, Ramakrushnapur PACs have only 184 registered farmers, 341 numbers of registered farmers of Maa Tarini SHG will be tagged to Ramakrushnapur PACS for smooth procurement of paddy."

5. The undisputed documents relied by the petitioner-

WSHG including the final list of selection as the paddy

procurement society/agency for KMS-2025-26 of Bonth Block

vide Annexure-7 prepared on dated 02.01.2026 is going to

show that, the petitioner was selected by the Opp. Parties as

the society/agency for the procurement of paddy for KMS

2025-26 of Bonth Block, but, on its next day, as per letter

No.125 dated 03.01.2026 vide Annexure-8, the Collector,

Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) eliminated/excluded the name of

the petitioner-WSHG from such list and tagged the registered

farmers of the petitioner-WSHG with Ramakrushnapur PACS

(Opp. Party No.6) on the grounds as indicated above in Para

No.4 of this Judgment.

6. When the petitioner was selected by the Opp. Parties as

a paddy procurement society/agency for the KMS 2025-26 of

Bonth Block and when trainings were provided to the

members of the petitioner-WSHG by the Opp. Parties for the

same and when the equipments were supplied by the Opp.

Parties to the petitioner-WSHG for procurement of paddy for

KMS 2025-26 and when in the final list of the selected WSHGs

as paddy procurement societies/agencies for KMS 2025-26 of

Bonth Block was prepared indicating/reflecting the name of

the petitioner in the Serial No.33 of Letter No.19 dated

02.01.2026 vide Annexure-7, then, on the basis of the said

undisputed documents vide Annexures 1 to 7, certain rights

were created in favour of the petitioner-WSHG as a selected

paddy procurement society/agency for the procurement of

paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Bonth Block and when on its next

day, as per the impugned Office Letter No.73 dated

03.01.2026 vide Annexure-8, the Opp. Party No.4

eliminated/excluded the name of the petitioner from such list

and tagged all the registered farmers of the petitioner with the

Opp. Party No.6-WSHG, then, at this juncture, as per law,

before elimination/exclusion of the name of the petitioner-

WSHG from Annexure-7 as per Annexure-8, an opportunity of

being heard should have been given by the Opp. Party No.4 to

the petitioner to have its say before the Opp. Party No.4

explaining/objecting the above grounds of its elimination, but,

the Opp. Party No.4 has not done so. Because, the Annexure-

8 does not reveal about providing any opportunity of being

heard to the petitioner-WSHG about the same.

7. When the impugned Office Letter No.73 dated

03.01.2026 vide Annexure-8 has been issued/passed by the

Opp. Party No.4, eliminating/excluding the name of the

petitioner-WSHG as a paddy procurement society/agency for

KMS 2025-26 of Bonth Block after creation of certain rights in

favour of the petitioner as per Annexures-1 to 7 without

issuing any show-cause, without giving any opportunity of

being heard to the petitioner-WSHG and without assigning

any reason for the same, then, at this juncture, the impugned

Letter/Order No.73 dated 03.01.2026 (Annexure-8) issued by

the Opp. Party No.4 (Collector, Bhadrak) cannot be

sustainable under.

For which, there is justification under law for making

interference with the same through this writ petition filed by

the petitioner-WSHG.

8. Therefore, there is merit in the writ petition filed by the

petitioner-WSHG. The same is to be allowed.

9. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is

allowed.

10. The impugned Letter/Order No.73 dated 03.01.2026 vide

Annexure-8 issued/passed by the Opp. Party No.4(Collector,

Bhadrak) relating to the elimination/exclusion of the name of

the petitioner-WSHG as a paddy procurement society/agency

of Bonth Block for KMS 2025-26 is quashed except the

tagging up of the registered farmers of the petitioner-WSHG

with the Opp. Party No.6-WSHG indicated/reflected in that

Annexure-8.

11. The Opp. Party No.4 (Collector, Bhadrak) is directed to

consider the matter relating to the elimination/exclusion of

the name of the petitioner as a paddy procurement

society/agency of Bonth Block for KMS 2025-26 afresh and

to take fresh decision on the same after issuance of show-

cause notice to the petitioner-WSHG providing the petitioner-

WSHG an opportunity for filing of its reply against the show-

cause as well as after giving opportunity of being heard to the

petitioner-WSHG and others, if any, in full compliance with

the principles of natural justice clarifying that, the tagging up

of the registered farmers of the petitioner-WSHG with the Opp.

Party No.6-WSHG for the procurement of the paddy for KMS-

2025-26 indicated in Annexure-8 is remained undisturb.

It is made clear here that, if in the fresh decision of the

Opp. Party No.4 (Collector, Bhadrak), it is found that, there

was no reason/cause/basis for the elimination/exclusion of

the name of the petitioner-WSHG as the paddy procurement

agency for KMC 2025-26 of Bonth Block, then, the petitioner-

WSHG is at liberty to claim compensation for unnecessary

harassments from the erring persons/officials, those had

alleged false and baseless allegations for its elimination.

12. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is

disposed of finally.

(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 30 .01. 2026// Rati Ranjan Nayak Sr. Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter