Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 54 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WA No.1287 of 2024
Women and Child Welfare Society, .... Appellant
Cuttack
Represented By Adv. -
Dr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others .... Respondents
Represented By Adv. -
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pati, Sr. Panel Counsel
(for Respondent No.1)
Mr. J.K. Bhal, Advocate
(for Respondent Nos.2 to 6)
CORAM:
JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER
06.01.2026 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. 1. Learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant and submits,
04. his client is a Non-Government Organization (NGO). It engages, inter alia, in programmes of road safety. The Orissa Road Safety Society decided to bar participation of his client in their programmes. It moved the writ Court. By impugned judgment dated 22nd December, 2023 the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition. His client is in appeal.
2. By order dated 04.03.2025 the matter was taken up by Coordinate Bench where one of us (M.S. Sahoo, J.) was a member and the following order was passed:
"1. Dr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant and submits, his client is a Non-Government Organization (NGO). It engages, inter alia, in programmes of road safety. The
Orissa Road Safety Society decided to bar participation of his client in their programmes. It moved the writ Court. By impugned judgment dated 22nd December, 2023 the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition. His client is in appeal.
2. Mr. Rayaguru, learned advocate, Senior Panel Counsel appears on behalf of respondents (Union of India). Mr. Dash, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State functionaries. Service is to be affected.
3. Inter alia, challenge in the writ petition was against minutes of proceeding of the general body meeting of the Society held on 21st October, 2019. Adjournment is granted for appellant to demonstrate basis of its prayer in the writ petition for the Society being compelled to allow its participation in the programmes.
4. List on 18th March, 2025."
3. We have heard the learned Dr. Mishra on behalf of the appellant at length. He refers to the said order dated 04.03.2025 and made elaborate submission, inter alia, stating that the appellant- institution after enquiry has been granted permission to receive funds under FCRA from the year 2022-23.
4. In response, Mr. Pati, learned Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India-respondent submits that during pendency of the writ petition inquiry before appropriate authority was pending as has been reflected correctly by the learned Single Judge at paragraph 18 of the judgment.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record, no illegality nor any infirmity. We reproduce the paragraphs-16, 17 and 18 which captures the facts of the case and also not challenged by appellant.
"16. In the instant matter, the 'Forum for Prevention of Road Accidents" Cuttack (Orissa) vide its application ID 0100000842019 dated 08-01- 2019 had applied for registration under the Act. As per inputs received from the Central Security Agency, the Association is a sister organization of other two NGOs namely Suprativa (having FCRA registration
No.104870155) and Women and Child Welfare Society being run by Shri Bikash Mohapatra, Secretary and Minati Bindhani, Joint Secretary respectively and has amassed a lot of property during last 12-15 years through allegedly unfair means. Running of FCRA NGO for personal gain attracts Section 12(4)(a)(vi) of the Act.
17. Moreover, "Forum for Prevention of Road Accidents" had obtained prior permission on 28-11-2013 to accept FC amounting to Dollar (US) 2500 from foreign donor namely Global Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety Klosbackstrasse, Switzerland, but the Association has not uploaded/furnished Annual Return and utilization Certificate to the Central Government, As such, the application of the Association for obtaining FCRA registration was rejected on 22-04-2019. Further the Additional Secretary to Government of Odisha (Special Section) Department was requested by this Ministry vide letter No.II/21022/20(0001)/2019- FCRA-II dated 29th July, 2019 to look into the matter in this regard and a report be expedited to this Ministry as regards the source of funds from which Shri Bikash Mohapatra, and Ms. Minati Bindhani has allegedly amassed properties.
18. Subsequently, as per available records, the Additional Secretary to Government of Odisha, vide its letter dated 07.08.2019 has directed the Collector, Cuttack to enquire into the matter and furnish a report in this matter. Report in this regard has been received by this Ministry on 13-08- 2021. Fresh inputs of the Central Security Agency have been sought and further action will be initiated as per Act and rules made thereunder."
6. In view of the above, we do not find any merit in the appeal and the same is disposed of.
7. Before parting with the case we clarify that as per principles of law to be followed in considering the writ appeal, we have confined our consideration to the pleadings and the records available in the writ petition.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak)
Judge
Digitally Signed Judge
Jyostna 17:39:19
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!