Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Silu Baba @ Dhananjaya vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 8607 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8607 Ori
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Silu Baba @ Dhananjaya vs State Of Odisha on 23 September, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                 JCRLA No.35 of 2015

              Silu Baba @ Dhananjaya                 ....      Appellant
              Pradhan

                                    Mr. S.N. Mishra-4, Advocate

                                          -versus-

              State of Odisha                        ....    Respondent

                                    Mr. Sarat Chandra Pradhan,
                                    Addl. Standing Counsel

                              CORAM:
                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA
                                     ORDER
Order No.                          23.09.2025
                                 I.A. No.236 of 2025

   05.            This    matter     is    taken     up   through   Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This is an application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

Heard.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted under sections 302/201/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand), in default of payment of fine, to undergo further R.I. for a period of three months for the offence under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of two years for

the offence under section 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of two months for the offence under section 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nayagarh in S.T. Case No.41/30 of 2013/2011.

Perused the impugned judgment.

Learned counsel for the State has produced the custody certificate of the petitioner received from the Superintendent of District Jail, Nayagarh dated 14.09.2025, which shows that up to 26.11.2017, the total custody period of the petitioner was seven years, seven months and nineteen days. The report further indicates that thereafter, he was transferred to Circle Jail, Phulbani.

Though the petitioner has not been released on bail by this Court, but the custody certificate from Circle Jail, Phulbani has not been produced.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is now in Circle Jail, Phulbani and he has sent the prisoner's petition in July, 2025 for his engagement and therefore, if the detention period in Circle Jail, Phulbani has taken into account, the total custody period of the petitioner would be more than fourteen years.

Learned counsel for the State has produced the conduct certificate received from the Superintendent of District Jail, Nayagarh, which shows that he was having good conduct and character inside the jail custody.

Learned counsel for the State also produced the report received from the Inspector in-charge of Fategarh police station dated 22.09.2025, which shows that there is no other criminal antecedent against the petitioner.

All the documents produced by the learned counsel for the State are taken on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is a case based on circumstantial evidence and there is no chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future and therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the period of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody for more than fourteen years and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, we are inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Let the appellant-petitioner be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of

the learned trial Court.

Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

( S.S. Mishra) Judge

06. Heard.

There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellant- petitioner till disposal of the criminal appeal.

The I.A. is disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

( S.S. Mishra) Judge RKM

Signed by: RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 24-Sep-2025 17:15:48

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter