Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8021 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2025
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
WP(C) No.23945 of 2025
An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India.
***
Debadutta Das ... Petitioner.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others ... Opposite Parties.
Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioner : Mr. B. Pujari, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. T. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.
P R E S E N T:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Date of Hearing : 09.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 09.09.2025
J UDGMEN T
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--
1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner
praying for directing the Addl. Sub-Collector, Pattamundai
(Opp. Party No.3) to carry out (implementation of) the final
order dated 25.02.2019 passed in Revision Case No.61 of
2013 by the Commissioner Consolidation, Board of Revenue,
Odisha, Cuttack. Because, till yet, in spite of such direction of
the Commissioner Consolidation, Board of Revenue, Odisha,
Cuttack, the Addl. Sub-Collector, Pattamundai (Opp. Party
No.3) is not implementing its direction.
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the Opp. Parties
3. The law has already been settled by the Apex Court in
the ratio of the decision reported in Jayamma & Others Vrs.
Deputy Commissioner, Hassan, Dist., Hassan & Others
(Para No.10) reported in III (2013) CLT 94 (SC) that,
"if a subordinate authority in the Government does not act in terms of the direction or instruction issued by the superior
authority, it is not for the High Court to compel that subordinate authority to comply with the instruction or direction issued by the higher authority of the Government. Because, High Court is not the executing forum of instruction issued by the Government Authorities. It is the duty of the authority of the Government, who passed the order to see that, its order is properly implemented."
4. So, in view of the above principles of law, liberty is
granted to the petitioner to file an application annexing the
certified copy of this Judgment before the Commissioner
Consolidation, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack praying
for implementation of the final order dated 25.02.2019
passed by it and if after filing of such an application before
the Commissioner Consolidation, Board of Revenue,
Odisha, Cuttack, no response is made to the same by the
Commissioner Consolidation, Board of Revenue, Odisha,
Cuttack then, the petitioner can approach the High Court
seeking appropriate relief for the same.
5. On the basis of the aforesaid directions, this writ
petition is to be disposed of finally.
6. Registry is directed to communicate this Judgment
immediately to the Commissioner Consolidation, Board of
Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack in reference to the disposed of
Revision Case No.61 of 2013.
7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is
disposed of finally.
(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE
High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 09 .09. 2025// Rati Ranjan Nayak Sr. Stenographer
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!