Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bijay Ketan Sethy vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 10490 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10490 Ori
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2025

Orissa High Court

Bijay Ketan Sethy vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 26 November, 2025

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                               W.P.(C) No.17436 of 2024

            Bijay Ketan Sethy                               ....                 Petitioner
                                                              Mr. B.K. Rout, Advocate

                                             -Versus-
            State of Odisha and others                      ....         Opposite Parties
                                                                    Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA,




             CORAM:
                           JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
                                             ORDER
Order No.                                   26.11.2025
   05.
                    Petition prayer reads as under:

"It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other suitable writ(s) to quash the impugned orders under Annexures-2 and 7, after declaring as illegal and bad in law;

And further be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Opp.parties to pay the arrear salary of the petitioner for the period from dt.0l.04.2001 to till 31.07.2003 with interest within a period of one month;

And further be pleased to direct the Opp.parties to give all consequential service benefits, such as seniority, annual increment etc. within a stipulated period;"

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits and learned AGA appearing for the other side does not much dispute that the subject matter of this petition is substantially similar to the one in

W.P.C(OAC) No.912 of 2001 between Pradeep Kumar Panda v. State of Odisha, disposed off by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.12.2021 and therefore, the benefit accorded to the litigant in the said case has to be extended to his client, who is similarly circumstanced. He also adds that the said judgment did not cover in so many words the direction for grant of consequential service benefits such as seniority and accrual of annual increments and therefore, that also should be granted to the petitioner. There is force in this submission.

3. The Co-ordinate Bench judgment at Paragraphs-9 & 10 read as under:

"9. Claim of petitioner for back wages for the period of wrongful termination till time of reappointment by adjustment appears to fulfill all the conditions necessary for Court to direct entitlement and payment. The period that petitioner remained under wrongful termination was on and from 1st April, 2001 till 24th July, 2003. Petitioner approached the Tribunal by this writ petition on 11th April, 2001, the day on which the Tribunal made observations regarding the prayer for interim relief of petitioner. That petitioner remained unemployed in the period and therefore there cannot be mitigation is proved by entries in the order sheet and petitioner's prompt acceptance of his adjustment, to be reappointed.

10. There will be order in the writ petition to give petitioner back wages for the period 1st April, 2001 till 24th July, 2003 at the rate of petitioner then drawing his salary and emoluments, if any, as Junior Clerk appointed under the rules. The aggregate of arrear back wages shall be disbursed to petitioner along with present bank interest on yearly fixed deposit calculated on simple basis for the period from 24th July, 2003 till date of payment. In event the payment is not made within six weeks from date of communication of this order, petitioner will be entitled same rate of interest on compound basis with yearly rests, for the period till payment."

In the above circumstances, this petition succeeds; a Writ of Certiorari issues quashing orders dated 31.03.2001 at Annexure-2 and dated 30.04.2024 at Annexure-7 to the extent the same related to the petitioner. A Writ of Mandamus issues to the OP Nos.2 & 3 to grant all benefits, as are granted to the litigant in the Co-ordinate petition, and further the benefit of back service such as seniority and annual increments by way of consequential benefits. This order should be complied with and compliance report should be filed with the Registrar General of this Court within an outer limit of eight weeks.

Interest payable is at the rate of 1% per mensem. The interest component may be recovered from the officials, who are responsible for the giving of cause of action for the subject petition. The reckoning point of the interest is the date on which the amount was otherwise payable to the petitioner.

Web copy of the order to be acted upon by all concerned.

( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge

Anisha

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 27-Nov-2025 16:13:47

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter