Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10475 Ori
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.603 of 2024
Sanjaya Kumar Nayak ..... Petitioner
Represented by
Mr. D.N.Rath, Advocate
-Versus-
Arabinda Agarwal, I.A.S. ..... Opp. Parties
and Others
Represented by A.G.A.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
26.11.2025.
Order No. 1. These matters are taken up through hybrid mode.
4. 2. Learned State counsel submits that the Petitioner has preferred S.L.P. against the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court. Mr. Rath responds by submitting that the S.L.P. was preferred only on the question of maintainability of the Writ Petition preferred by the private Opp. Parties against the order passed in the Writ Appeal. In the meantime, a larger Bench of this Court held that the Writ Appeal by the private Opp. Party is not maintainable. The State having not challenged the judgment before any forum cannot shy away from implementing the judgment.
3. Learned State counsel shall take instructions specifically in this regard and apprise this Court as to why the judgment of this Court remains unimplemented even though there has been no challenge to it by the State and there is no stay granted by any Court with regard to implementation of the judgment.
4. List this matter on 07.1.2026.
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack (Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge AKB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!