Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rasmita Kumari Raulo vs Jitendra Muni ....... Opposite Party
2025 Latest Caselaw 10393 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10393 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2025

Orissa High Court

Rasmita Kumari Raulo vs Jitendra Muni ....... Opposite Party on 25 November, 2025

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK

                     TRP(C) No.445 of 2021
                  (An application under Section 24 of the
                      Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)



     Rasmita Kumari Raulo                         .......     Petitioner

                                    -Versus-
     Jitendra Muni                                .......   Opposite Party


       Advocate for the parties

           For Petitioner                         : Mr. R.R. Mishra,
                                                    Advocate

           For Opposite Party                     : None

                            ...................

            CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA


           Date of Hearing & Judgment: 25.11.2025
_____________________________________________________________

S.K. MISHRA, J.

1. This transfer petition has been preferred by the

Petitioner-Wife for transfer of MAT case No.23 of 2021 from the

Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aska to the Court

of learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur on the grounds

detailed in the Transfer Petition.

2. Despite notice, the Opposite Party goes

unrepresented when the matter is called. Hence, as prayed by

the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the transfer petition is

taken up for hearing and disposal in absence of the Opposite

Party.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

4. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer petition,

learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits, the Petitioner is a

deserted lady. After her desertion, she is staying with her old

and ailing father at Berhampur. That apart, the distance from

her father's house to the Court at Aska is around 80 KMs. There

is no male member in her family to accompany her to attend the

day to day proceeding at Aska. That apart, for her livelihood,

after her desertion, the Petitioner is serving as Teacher in a

School at Berhampur.

5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further submits, at

the instance of the Petitioner, C.P. No.452 of 2021 is now

pending in the Court of learned Judge Family Court,

Berhampur, Ganjam for restitution of conjugal rights. The

present Opposite Party, being the Opposite Party in the said

case, has already appeared and is contesting the said case

before the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur,

Ganjam. That apart, the Opposite Party-husband is serving as

Sub-Inspector of Police at Paradip. It would also be convenient

for him, if the MAT Case No.23 of 2021 is transferred to the

Court at Berhampur.

6. Law is well settled that, while dealing with the

application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the Court

has to examine various factors and the most important factor is

convenience of wife.

7. At this juncture, it would be apt to deal with the

Judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 2022 SCC Online

SC 1199 (N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha),

wherein it was held as follows:-

" 9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.

10. Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions."

(Emphasis Supplied)

8. In view of the reasons detailed in the transfer

petition so also submissions made by the learned Counsel for

the Petitioner and the settled position of law, the prayer made in

the transfer petition is allowed. The learned Civil Judge (Sr.

Division), Aska is directed to transmit the case record in MAT

Case No.23 of 2021 to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court,

Berhampur at the earliest, preferably within a period of one

week from the date of production of certified copy of this

Judgment.

9. On receiving the case record in MAT Case No.23 of

2021 from the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Aska,

the learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur shall re-register

the said case, if so required, and proceed further in accordance

with law giving due opportunity to both the parties.

10. Since C.P. No.452 of 2021, at the instance of the

Petitioner, is pending before the same Court, for convenience of

parties, both MAT Case No.23 of 2021 and C.P. No.452 of 2021

be tried together by posting both the said cases to same date.

11. The learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur is

requested to explore the facilities of Video Conferencing

available in the said Court and permit the parties to appear

before him through virtual mode following due procedure, as

prescribed under the Orissa High Court Video Conferencing for

Courts Rules, 2020. However, on the dates of effective hearing

i.e. for examination and cross-examination of witnesses and

other purposes, for which their presence may be required by the

Court and if it is so ordered, the parties shall remain physically

present before the learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur.

12. To avoid delay and notice, the parties are directed to

make a query themselves or through their Counsel regarding

the date and purpose of posting of MAT Case No.23 of 2021 and

participate in the proceeding in the Court of learned Judge,

Family Court, Berhampur. They are further directed not to ask

for unnecessary adjournments and cooperate with the learned

Judge, Family Court, Berhampur who shall do well to conclude

both the proceedings in MAT Case No.23 of 2021 and C.P.

No.452 of 2021 at the earliest, preferably within a period of six

months from the date of receipt of the record in MAT Case No.23

of 2021 from the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division),

Aska.

13. With the said observation and direction, the transfer

petition stands disposed of.

14. Interim order dated 31.01.2022 passed in I.A. No.509

of 2021 stands vacated.

15. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this

Judgment to the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division),

Aska so also the learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur,

Ganjam for compliance.

16. Urgent certified copy of this Judgment be granted on

proper application as per rules.

...............................

S.K. MISHRA, J.

Orissa High Court, Cuttack.

Dated, the 25th November, 2025/ Prasant

Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN

Date: 26-Nov-2025 18:03:44

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter