Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5134 Ori
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.6294 of 2024
Lakshmi Satnami ..... Petitioner
Mr. Bijaya Kumar Behera-1
Advocate
-versus-
1. Alok Kar, Director
(R & R) & Ex-Officio,
Additional Secretary to
Govt., Department of
Water Resources,
Odisha, Bhubaneswar
2. Kalu Majhi, Special
Land Acquisition
Officer, Lower Indra
Irrigation Project,
Khariar, Nuapada ..... Contemnors/
Opp. Parties
Mr. Jateswar Nayak,
Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
THE HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No. 19.03.2025
02. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
Heard.
Designation: Senior Stenographer
The petitioner, Lakshmi Satnami has filed this ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Mar-2025 12:58:56
contempt petition as the contemnors/opposite parties have flouted the order dated 17.05.2024 passed in
W.P.(C) No.12324 of 2024, wherein direction was issued to the Land Acquisition Officer, Lower Indra Irrigation Project, Khariar, Nuapada, contemnor/opp. party no.2 to dispose of the L.A.R. Case No.32 of 2007 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order and if the application under section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is allowed, then the compensation amount be disbursed to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter.
As per the order dated 21.11.2024, learned counsel for the State has received instructions from the contemnor/opp. party no.1 dated 15.01.2025, which is taken on record. The relevant portion of the instructions is as follows:
"I am directed to convey the sanction of the payment Rs.17,18,756/- (seventeen lakhs eighteen thousand seven hundred fifty six) only towards the decretal dues u/s 28(A) of the L.A. Act, 1894 in favour of Bhoka Satanami of the village- Pendrawan under Lower Indra Irrigation Project, Khariar, Nuapada for Ac.1.38 dec. of land considering the application of Lakshmi Satnami at par with the judgment dtd.16.05.2023 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nuapada in L.A.R. No.32 of 2007 (Sukmati Majhi & others -Vs- Spl. LA & RRO, LIIP, Khariar, Nuapada)."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount, which has been sanctioned by the
contemnor/opp. party no.1 is at a lower side and the petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the sanctioned amount before the appropriate authority.
In view of the above development, the contempt petition stands dropped granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the sanctioned amount before the appropriate authority.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
(Savitri Ratho) Judge Sipun
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!