Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pradyumna Sa vs Trinath Barik & Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 4928 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4928 Ori
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2025

Orissa High Court

Pradyumna Sa vs Trinath Barik & Others on 12 March, 2025

Author: Murahari Sri Raman
Bench: Murahari Sri Raman
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                              LAA No.41 of 2015

            Pradyumna Sa                             ....           Appellant
                                            Mr. Ankit Mohanty, Advocate on
                                     behalf of Mr. Adhiraj Behera, Advocate
                                       -versus-
            Trinath Barik & Others                   ....        Respondents

Mr. C. Anand Rao, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gokula Nanda Sahu, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mr. Anshuman Sethy, ASC for Respondent No.4

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. ORDER

24. 12.03.2025 This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. This Court vide order dated 17.02.2025 recording the submission of Mr. C. Anand Rao, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 passed the following order:-

"2. Mr. C. Anand Rao, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Gokulananda Sahu, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3 submitted that respondent no.1 failed to substantiate his claim to be adopted son of Sumitra, even before this Court in RSA No.301 of 2014 (Arnapurna Pradhan Vrs. Trinath Barik and others), disposed of on 27.09.2024. He submitted that by virtue of the impugned judgment dated 25.07.2015 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sundargarh in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.4 of 2009, it has clearly been established that the purchaser (Basanta Kumar Naik) of the suit schedule property, is entitled to receive the entire

compensation amount of Rs.13,75,860/- on account of acquisition of his land by the Government out of Hal Khata No.65 of Mouza- Girisuan. The said judgment is under challenge in the present Land Acquisition Appeal.

3. Mr. C.A. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3 further submitted that the appellant having lost the claim before this Court in the 2nd Appeal, there remains nothing for further adjudication for determining the entitlement of the valid purchaser for receiving the aforesaid compensation amount. Therefore, he suggested to dismiss this Land Acquisition Appeal.

4. At this stage, Mr. Adhiraj Behera, learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks ten days accommodation as a last indulgence.

5. List this matter on 04.03.2025."

3. As is revealed, this matter has been kept pending in view of the Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).819 of 2025 has been filed by the Trinath Barik (Respondent No.1 herein) challenging the Judgment dated 27.09.2024 passed by this Court in RSA No.301 of 2014.

4. Today, it is brought to the notice of this Court that said SLP has come to be dismissed vide order dated 21.02.2025 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

5. In view of the said position, this Land Acquisition Appeal is dismissed and Judgment dated 25.07.2015 passed in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.04 of 2009 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sundargarh is confirmed. Accordingly, the purchaser of the suit schedule property, namely, Basanta Kumar Naik is

entitled to receive the entire compensation of amount of Rs.13,75,860/- on account of acquisition of his land by the Government out of Hal Khata No.65 of Mouza-Girisuan. The Respondent No.4-Land Acquisition Officer, Sundargarh is requested to act as per Judgment dated 25.07.2015 passed in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.04 of 2009 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sundargarh.

6. Mr. C. Anand Rao, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Gokula Nanda Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 submitted that during the pendency of the litigation, ex- gratia amount is pending for disbursal by the Additional District Magistrate (Revenue), Sundargarh.

7. In this regard, the purchaser, namely, Basanta Kumar Naik may file representation/application before the authority concerned- Additional District Magistrate (Revenue), Sundargarh, which shall be considered and the said authority is also required to take into account the entitlement as adjudicated in the judgment dated 25.07.2015 of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sundargarh in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.04 of 2009.

(M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant

Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Mar-2025 17:53:50

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter