Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bandana Palei & Ors vs Union Of India .......... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4805 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4805 Ori
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2025

Orissa High Court

Bandana Palei & Ors vs Union Of India .......... Opposite ... on 10 March, 2025

Author: S.K. Panigrahi
Bench: S.K. Panigrahi
                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                                        F.A.O. No. 568 of 2024
                                  Bandana Palei & Ors.                         ........    Petitioner(s)
                                                                              Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Adv.
                                                             -Versus-
                                  Union of India                        .......... Opposite Parties
                                                             Mr. Alok Kumar Mohanty, Sr. Panel Counsel

                                              CORAM:
                                              DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
                                                             ORDER

10.03.2025 Order No. I.A. No.1030 of 2024

01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. This application has been filed for condoning the delay of 13

days in preferring the Appeal.

3. Heard.

4. Considering the submissions and on going through the

averments made in this I.A., prayer is allowed. Delay in

preferring the Appeal is, hereby, condoned.

5. I.A. is disposed of.

1. The present appeal at the instance of the claimants/ appellants

Signed by: LITARAM MURMU is directed against the judgment dated 28.08.2024 passed by the Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Mar-2025 18:35:17

learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench,

Bhubaneswar in Case No.OA(IIU)/106/2023.

2. Heard.

3. The brief fact of the case is that prior to the date of incident,

the deceased Srikant Palei had gone to Chennai for search of job

and when he failed to get Job at Chennai, he decided to return

to his native place at Baleswar. Accordingly, on 16.08.2023, the

deceased along with two co-passengers named Pintu Palei and

Gurbha Lohar boarded in the general class compartment of

Chennai-Howrah mail express train and undertook Journey

from Chennai to Baleswar railway station. It is stated that before

boarding into the train, the deceased had contacted his family

members about his return to home due to not getting any job at

Chennai. It is further stated that during course of journey in the

said train, on 17.08.2023, just before two kilometers before

Baleswar railway station, due to push and pull of passengers,

the deceased Srikant Palei accidentally fell down from the said

train at KM No.233/21-23, sustained injuries and found lying

near the track in between UP and Down track in injured

condition. It is further stated that, on seeing the deceased in

injured condition, nearby villager named Kartik intimated the

Digitally Signed matter to SMR, Baleswar through his mobile phone. After

Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Mar-2025 18:35:17 receiving message, SMR, Baleswar made station diary entry and

with the help of RPF, the injured was shifted to hospital by

ambulance where the doctor declared him dead on the same

day. It is further stated that based on the memo received from

SMR, Baleswar, IIC, Baleswar, GRPS registered an UD case

No.82/23 dated 18.08.2023, made inquest over the dead body

and sent the body for post mortem examination. It was stated

that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and on the date of

incident, he was travelling on the strength of a railway ticket

and the time of inquest, the I.O. seized the said ticket in

possession with the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that the learned

Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- in favour of the

Appellants. However, the Appellants were permitted to

withdraw only 10% of the awarded amount each. He further

submits that since the Appellants are suffering from various

diseases, they may be permitted to withdraw the entire awarded

amount.

5. In such view of the matter, this Court modifies only that part

of the judgment dated 28.08.2024 passed by the learned Railway

Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case

No.OA(IIU)/106/2023 and directs that the Appellants /claimants

Digitally Signed will be permitted to withdraw 50% of their share as awarded in

Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Mar-2025 18:35:17 the judgment dated 28.08.2024.

6. This FAO is, accordingly, disposed of.

( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge

Murmu

Designation: Personal Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter