Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1901 Ori
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No.353 of 2016
Susa @ Sushanta Rout & .... Appellants/
others Petitioners
Mr. Subash Chandra Puspalaka,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha .... Respondent/
Opp. Party
Mr. Aurobinda Mohanty,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA
ORDER
Order No. 30.07.2025
I.A. No.963 of 2025
28. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
This is an application for bail filed by the appellant- petitioner no.6, Bhagaban Arisal.
The appellants-petitioners have been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 147/ 148/ 452/ 323/ 506/427/302/149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 9(B) of the Indian Explosive Act and Section 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act and they were directed to undergo R.I. for one year each under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code, sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years each under Section
148 of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo R.I. for three years each and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three years) each, in default, to undergo R.I. for six months each under sections 452/149 of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo imprisonment for life each and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each, in default, to undergo R.I. for six months each under section 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo R.I. for one year each under Section 427/149 of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo R.I. for one year each under Section 506/149 of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo R.I. for one year each under Section 9B(b) of the Explosive Act, 1984, sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years each and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) each, in default, to undergo R.I. for three months each under Section 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Khurda in S.T. No.56 of 2013 & ST-7 of 2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner no.6 along with bail application of appellant no.5, Babu @ Satis Arisal, appellant no.7, Bhagirathi Jujharsingh, appellant no.13, Dipu Sundaray and appellant no.14, Rabi Sundaray were rejected earlier. He further submits that subsequently by the order dated 17.01.2017, the bail application of appellant no.5, Babu @ Satis Arisal and appellant no.13, Dipu Sundaray were allowed. Similarly, as per the order dated 21.04.2023, the bail application of appellant no.14, Rabi Sundaray was allowed and by order dated 12.05.2023, the bail application
of appellant no.7, Bhagirathi Jujharsingh was allowed. Since the petitioner no.6, Bhagaban Arisal stands on the similar footing and he is in judicial custody for more than nine years and there is no chance of any early hearing of the Criminal Appeal in the near future, the bail application may be favourably considered.
Learned counsel for the State has not disputed about the release of the co-appellants whose bail application along with the petitioners were rejected vide order dated 27.09.2016.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the period of detention of the petitioner no.6, Bhagaban Arisal in the judicial custody, release of the similarly situated co-appellants on bail, we are inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail and direct the appellant no.6, Bhagaban Arisal to be released on bail.
Let the appellant no.6, Bhagaban Arisal be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
( S.S. Mishra) Judge
Heard.
There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellant-petitioner pursuant to the judgment and order dated 24.06.2016 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Khurda in S.T. No.56 of 2013 & ST-7 of 2015 till disposal of the criminal appeal.
The Misc. Case is disposed of.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
( S.S. Mishra) Judge Subhasis
Designation: Personal Assistant
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 30-Jul-2025 19:31:50
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!