Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramesh Chandra Sahu vs Vishal Kumar Dev And
2025 Latest Caselaw 3128 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3128 Ori
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Ramesh Chandra Sahu vs Vishal Kumar Dev And on 30 January, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                          CONTC No.7850 of 2024

            Ramesh Chandra Sahu               .....          Petitioner

                                           Mr. Nirmal Ranjan Routray,
                                           Advocate
                                            -versus-
            Vishal Kumar Dev and
            others                            .....        Contemnors/
                                                           Opp. Parties
                                           Mr. Aurobinda Mohanty,
                                           Addl. Standing Counsel
                                       CORAM:
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
             THE HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

                                      ORDER

Order No. 30.01.2025

01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner Ramesh Chandra Sahu with the following prayer:

"It is therefore, prayed that your Lordships be graciously pleased to initiate a contempt proceeding against the contemnor and appropriate action as provided under the Contempt of Courts Act and as provided under any other provision of law may be taken against him for deliberate and intentional violation of the order dtd.03.02.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 17048/2013".

Learned counsel for the petitioner placed the order dated 03.02.2021 in which this Court while adjudicating the challenge of the petitioner to the order dated 07.03.2009 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.846 (C) of 2009 has been pleased to hold as follows:

"11. In the present case, the finding of the Tribunal that the petitioner had approached the Tribunal after his retirement, is nothing, but non-application of mind of the Tribunal. The petitioner had approached the Tribunal on number of occasions before his retirement, as indicated in aforementioned paragraphs. Thus the finding of the Tribunal in the impugned order, so far as petitioner is concerned, is liable to be quashed and according the same is quashed.

12. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the observations/ directions given in aforementioned cases. Accordingly this Court directs that the petitioner should be treated to have been regularized in service at least one day prior to his superannuation, by creating supernumerary post, if necessary and accordingly he shall be extended with the pensionary benefits as would be admissible to him. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date

of receipt of the copy of this order".

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the aforesaid order was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the State of Orissa in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8876 of 2021 and after hearing

the parties vide order dated 16.07.2024, the following order was passed:

"In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment. However, order passed by the High Court be implemented within a period of three months else the respondent shall be at liberty to take recourse before the High Court.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of".

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in spite of the order of this Court so also the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the petitioner has not received the benefits as extended to him in the aforesaid order.

It is the further contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the contemnor/opp. party no.2 Mr. Suresh Chandra Moharana, Chief Engineer (P)-cum- C.E.I. (G), Orissa is the authority, who is to carry out the order.

Learned counsel for the State submitted that instruction has already been sought for from the concerned authority yesterday (29.01.2025) and the matter may be taken up a week after.

List this matter on 11.02.2025. On that day, the contemnor/opp. party no.2 shall appear virtually at 10.30 a.m.

A free copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the State.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(Savitri Ratho) Judge sipun

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 31-Jan-2025 14:07:04

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter