Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagadish Kumar Acharya And vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3039 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3039 Ori
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Jagadish Kumar Acharya And vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ... on 29 January, 2025

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                   CRLMC No. 3224 of 2022
                 Jagadish Kumar Acharya and       ....               Petitioner(s)
                 others
                                                   Mr. K.C. Pradhan, Advocate


                                            -versus-

             State of Odisha and another          ....          Opposite Party(s)
                                                    Mr. U.R. Jena, AGA
                                            Mr. D.P. Das, Advocate for O.P.2



                      CORAM: JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

                                         ORDER
Order No.                               29.01.2025
 07.        1.        Heard.

2. At the instance of the opposite party No.2, the F.I.R. in

Hemagiri P.S. Case No. 182 of 2021 came to be registered against

the petitioners corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1180 of 2021,

pending the court of the learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh for the

alleged commission of offences under Sections 498-

A/294/323/506/34 of I.P.C.

3. The allegation against the petitioners are that the informant

submitted a written report at Hemagiri P.S. that she got married to

Prabin Acharya-petitioner no.3 son of petitioner no.1 of Ujalpur

(Beldhipa) on 05.02.2019 as per Hindu ritual. After 15 days of

marriage her husband, the father in law and mother in law had

started torturing her both physically and mentally for more dowry.

As her father did not give motor cycle during marriage, her husband

and father-in-law tortured her all the times. Then she blessed with a

child and now her age about 19 months. But her daughter kept with

her husband and the father in law assaulted her by a small blade and

got injured in her left hand. Her husband and father in law taken

away her ATM card, certificate and other dowry articles and did not

give her and threatened her to kill. On 21.04.2021 she along with

her husband and daughter came to her parental house at Hemgiri on

Ram Nabami . On the same day at about 12.30 P.M. her husband

called her in a room and assaulted her and then he abused her

father, mother and sister in filthy language and quarreled with them.

Thereafter, on 16.6.2021 they amicable settled their dispute and she

went to her in-laws house. But again her husband, father-in-law and

mother-in-law tortured her for more dowry. On dated 28.7.21 at

about 8.30 P.M. her father-in -law and mother-in-law abused her in

filthy language and let her and her daughter out from the house and

locked the outer gate. Then she called her father over phone and her

father came with the village gentry and rescued her and took her to

Hemgiri. Her husband and father-in-law are working in Forest

Department and they threatened her parents to kill them. Hence, the

F.I.R.

4. All the three petitioners and the opposite party No.2 are

present in the Court and being represented and identified by their

respective counsels. They have also filed self-attested copies of

their Aadhaar Cards to establish their identity, which are taken on

record.

5. After investigation, charge sheet in the present case has

already been submitted on 06.10.2021 for the alleged offences as

mentioned above. Before the trial could commence, the parties have

entered into a settlement. On the basis of the comprised terms, all

the three petitioners and opposite party no.2 have approached this

Court for quashing of the entire proceeding and they have also filed

separate affidavits dated 28.01.2025, stating inter alia that they have

resumed their marital live, hence they are seeking quashing of the

proceeding. The relevant contents of the affidavit filed by the

informant-opposite party no.2 are reproduced hereunder:-

"2. That myself and petitioner no.3 are legally married couple blessed with a daughter namely Bhagyashree. Due to some misunderstanding between us, there was a case vide G.R. Case No.1180/2021 arising out of Hemgir P.S. Case No.182/2021 pending before the learned JMFC, Hemagiri.

3. That in presence of both the parties along with village Bhadraloks and our family members, we

agreed to stay unitedly and agreed to resume our conjugal relationship in the same way at before without any hesitation. Accordingly, we have been maintaining out conjugal life happily in my husband's house.

4. That we both decided to withdraw all cases filed at different courts against each other. And we decided to give respect each other to maintain our conjugal life with good understanding.

5. That I filed this affidavit without any pressure from any person, I filed in our good understanding for maintain our conjugal life smoothly.

6. That as per term and condition of the compromise petition we (both wife and husband) to look our female child without any hesitation.

7. That as per term and condition of the compromise petition we both maintain our family happily without any hesitation till ever."

6. Mr. Jena, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the

State submits that the dispute has already been resolved by the

parties and they have also filed affidavits before this Court to that

effect, there is no legal impediment in quashing of the criminal

proceeding.

7. Regard being had to the fact that the dispute is arising out

of matrimonial discord and parties have already settled their dispute

to that effect they have already filed separate affidavits before this

Court and the opposite party no.2 has already stated before this

Court that she has resumed her marital life and she is also blessed

with a child, I am inclined to allow the present petition. Further,

continuation of the present proceeding will not endure any benefit

to either parties and, therefore, in these circumstances subjecting

the petitioners to rigors of the trial is destined to be futile exercise.

The case of the petitioners is directly covered by the judgment of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh vs. State of

Punjab and another reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and B.S. Joshi

& others vs. State of Haryana & another reported in (2003) 4 SCC

8. Accordingly, the criminal proceeding in connection with

Hemagiri P.S. Case No.182 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case

No.1180 of 2021 pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M.,

Sundargarh is quashed qua the petitioners.

09. The CRLMC is accordingly disposed of.

(S.S. Mishra) Judge Ashok

Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR JAGADEB

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Jan-2025 18:04:29

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter