Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4293 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No. 190 of 2023
Bhagyashree Mohanta .... Appellant
Mr. S.R. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Priyakanta Mohanta .... Respondent
Mr. P.K. Panda, Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No. 20.02.2025 03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
2. The present Appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 29th March 2023 of the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada passed in C.P. No.72 of 2021, wherein decree of divorce was granted at the behest of the husband by dissolving the marriage between the Parties.
3. The Appellant and Respondent married on 29th November 2017 as per the Hindu Customs and Rights. From the allegations of the husband it emerges that the wife started behaving abnormally on the very forth night of the marriage and he came to know that the wife was receiving treatment for her psychiatric problem and was taking medicines prior to their marriage. The said fact was stated by all the witnesses present on behalf of the husband-Petitioner, which could not be sufficiently rebutted by the wife-Respondent. It is seen from the evidence of wife-D.W.1 that she has refused to join the union with her husband even though the husband was agreeable to take her back. The conciliation proceeding before this Court also failed as per the report of the Mediation Cell.
4. The amount of Rs.5 lakhs towards permanent alimony as directed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada has already been received by her in course of mediation and in addition to the same, a further sum of Rs.1,70,000/- has also been received by the wife towards the amount paid by her father through various bank transaction after marriage.
5. In the circumstances taking note of the evidences brought on record, we are not inclined to disturb the decree of divorce between the Parties as granted by the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada. The wife- Appellant also seeks to challenge the impugned judgment limiting her claim to the quantum of permanent alimony.
6. The husband is serving as a primary school teacher in the district of Mayurbhanj. As per the finding of the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada, the husband-Respondent was receiving Rs.26,000/- per month towards his salary in the year 2022. It is submitted by the wife-Appellant that in the meantime his salary has been increased to Rs.39,723/- per month. Taking note of the same and the circumstances of the case and the fact as to refusal of the wife to join the union with her husband, and all other surrounding factors, we feel it apposite to direct for payment of further amount of Rs.3.50 lakhs towards permanent alimony in addition to the amount already paid by the husband. The enhanced amount of Rs.3.50 lakhs shall be paid by the husband-Respondent in favour of the
wife-Appellant through Bank Draft depositing the same before the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada within a period of sixty days from today which shall be released in favour of the wife with the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Family Court, Baripada.
7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Appeal is disposed of.
(B.P. Routray) Judge
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
AKPradhan/ Bijay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!