[Cites 5, Cited by 0]
Orissa High Court
*** vs State Of Odisha & Others on 16 December, 2025
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
WP(C) No.33564 of 2025
An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India.
***
Sania Singh
... Petitioner.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others
... Opposite Parties.
Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioner : Mr. B.C. Ghadei, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Ms. J. Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel.
P R E S E N T:
HONOURABLE
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Date of Hearing : 16.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 16.12.2025
J UDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--
1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner
praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (O.P. No.3)
to receive the deed for sale of the petitioner for registration,
because, the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (O.P. No.3) orally
refused to receive the deed for sale of the petitioner for
registration. For which, without getting any way, the petitioner
filed this writ petition.
2. Heard from the learned counsels of both the sides.
3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar
cannot orally refuse to receive any document/deed, when the
same is presented before him/her for registration. He/she
(Sub-Registrar) is either to register the document/deed or to
refuse to register the same indicating the reasons in writing
for the non-registration of the same, if that document is not
legally fit for registration.
According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa
Registration Rules, 1988, when a document is presented for
registration, it is the duty of the Sub-Registrar to receive the
same, but, if the said document is not in compliance with the
provisions of law, the Sub-Registrar may refuse to accept that
document for registration assigning the reasons in writing
about the same.
4. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been
clarified in a decision between North East Infrastructure
Private Limited and Ors. Vrs. The State of Andhra
Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2025 (2) Civ.C.C. 220
(Andhra Pradesh) and in a case between Antaryami Nayak
Vs. State of Odisha & Others in WP(C) No.18548 of 2025
decided on 11.07.2025 that,
"The Sub-Registrar/Registrar, cannot orally refuse to
receive the document and would consider the fitness of it
for registration or otherwise. Section 71 of the Registration
Act, 1908 empowers the Registration Authorities to receive
a document which is presented for registration and process
the same.
5. So, by applying the principles of law enunciated in the
ratio of the above decisions and also taking the Rule 147 of
The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988 into account, it is felt
proper to dispose of this writ petition finally directing Sub-
Registrar, Khandagiri (O.P. No.3) to receive the deed for sale of
the petitioner, if presented by the petitioner for registration
annexing the certified copy of this Judgment and to act upon
the same as per The Indian Registration Act, 1908 and The
Orissa Registration Rules, 1988.
If the said deed is registered, then after registration of
that deed for sale, the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (O.P. No.3)
shall return that said sale deed to the petitioner within 3 days
of its registration after complying all the formalities thereof as
per Rule 100 of The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988 and
Notification No.2915 dated 02.08.2017 of I.G.R of Odisha.
6. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is
disposed of finally.
(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA)
JUDGE
High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
The 16 .12. 2025// Rati Ranjan Nayak
Sr. Stenographer
