Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ami @ Sankarsan Padhi vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 5556 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5556 Ori
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Orissa High Court

Ami @ Sankarsan Padhi vs State Of Odisha on 18 August, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                             CRLA No.48 of 2025

              Ami @ Sankarsan Padhi               ....     Appellant/
                                                         Petitioner

                                   Mr. Debasis Sarangi, Advocate

                                       -versus-

              State of Odisha                     ....   Respondent/
                                                        Opp. Party

                                 Mr. Jateswar Nayak,
                                 Addl. Government Advocate and
                                 Mr. Debi Prasad Dhal, Senior
                                 Advocate along with Mr. Haripad
                                 Mohanty, Advocate for the
                                 informant

                             CORAM:
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA
                             ORDER
Order No.                  18.08.2025

   06.           This   matter    is    taken     up   through   Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This is an application for bail.

Heard Mr. Debasis Sarangi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-petitioner, Mr. D.P. Dhal, learned Senior Advocate along with Mr. Haripad Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the informant and Mr. Jateswar Nayak, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent- State.

The appellant-Ami @ Sankarsan Padhi has been convicted under section 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand), in default, to undergo R.I. for one year for the offence punishable under Section 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Sessions Judge, Ganjam, Berhampur in Sessions Trial No.19 of 2014.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was taken on remand in connection with this case on 26.03.2013 and he was released on bail on 15.07.2014. Though there are three eye witnesses to the occurrence, i.e., P.W.1, P.W.9 and P.W.15, but none have implicated the petitioner in the assault to the deceased Shanti Prasad Mishra, which is stated to have taken place on 29.01.2013. He further submits that two witnesses i.e. P.W.3 and P.W.7 stated about the conspiracy part involving the petitioner, but they disclosed about that one month after the alleged conspiracy taken place, therefore, it may not be safe to place reliance on their evidence to convict the petitioner. He further submits that there are good chances of success in the case and the balance of convenience is in his favour, therefore, the bail application may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State has submitted

that there are some criminal antecedents against the petitioner. However, Mr. Sarangi, learned counsel for the petitioner replied to such submission inter alia stating that out of five cases, in three cases, he has been acquitted, in one case, the final report has been submitted and one case is pending subjudice. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the fact that the petitioner was on bail in connection with this case during trial and there is no material that he has misutilised his liberty in any manner while on bail and the nature of evidence adduced and the fact that there is no chance of any early hearing of the appeal in the near future, we are inclined to release the petitioner on bail, subject to the condition that he shall not come in contact with the family members of the deceased or any of the prosecution witnesses in any manner and he shall not indulge himself in any criminal activities in any manner whatsoever. Violation of any terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.

Let the appellant-petitioner be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

( S.S. Mishra) Judge

07. Heard.

There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellant- petitioner pursuant to the judgment and order dated 07.11.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ganjam, Berhampur in Sessions Trial No.19 of 2014.

The I.A. is disposed of.



                                                                         (S.K. Sahoo)
                                                                            Judge



                                                                         (S.S. Mishra)
  Subhasis                                                                  Judge






Designation: Personal Assistant

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 18-Aug-2025 19:39:27

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter